2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waiting for elective surgery: a qualitative analysis and conceptual framework of the consequences of delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Each vignette described a patient by four characteristics: the physical symptoms, the psychological distress, the social limitations, and impairments in work. These characteristics were selected on the basis of interviews with experts on the consequences of waiting [1] and existing literature on generic priority criteria for waiting lists [16]. Three possible levels were defined for each characteristic, based on the range in outcomes of an earlier study on the consequences of waiting for surgery among patients with the three disorders [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each vignette described a patient by four characteristics: the physical symptoms, the psychological distress, the social limitations, and impairments in work. These characteristics were selected on the basis of interviews with experts on the consequences of waiting [1] and existing literature on generic priority criteria for waiting lists [16]. Three possible levels were defined for each characteristic, based on the range in outcomes of an earlier study on the consequences of waiting for surgery among patients with the three disorders [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although waiting lists can serve a purpose in rationing scarce resources, overly long delays of necessary treatment can have widespread negative consequences [1] and threaten the principles of providing timely and equitable access to care. Consequently, responsible health authorities have attached high importance to addressing problematic waiting times, amongst others in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, Sweden, and the Netherlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, waiting lists are comprised of patients whose conditions are not immediately life-threatening and permit treatment to be provided on an elective basis. However, long delays of needed treatment have raised public and political concern, as they could entail diverse negative consequences for patients [6] and subsequently pose a threat to the quality of care. Studies among patients waiting for cardiac or orthopaedic surgery have for instance shown that waiting is associated with deterioration of symptoms [7,8], affected quality of life [8,9] and even death of listed patients [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Patients waiting can lead to loss of opportunity for care, which may result in higher health care costs due to additional treatments [29,30] and lower quality of life [31]. Existing literature on the value of waiting time for surgery has focused on the productivity costs such as income loss, community service such as home help, medical treatment at home and hospital stay [32], and utility loss [33].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%