1996
DOI: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00267.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waist Circumference as a Screening Tool for Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Evaluation of Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC)

Abstract: THANG S. HAN, EDITH M. VAN LEER, JACOBC. SEIDELL AND MICHAEL EJ LEAN. Waist circumference as a screening tool for cardiovascular risk factors: evaluation of receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Obes Res. 1996;4:533-547. To evaluate the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to determine the cutoffs of waist circumference as a potential population directed screening tool for hypercholesterolaemia (26.5 mmoYL), low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (~0.9 mmoYL), and hypertension (treated and/or systoli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
2
14

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
58
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…55 y old at some sites are in line with the notion that high overall adiposity is not more associated with CVD in older than younger subjects. 1,44 In these populations and in West African men in particular, WC values were generally lower than those that have been described for Western populations. 10,21,45,46 The reason for this may due to the mean BMI values in these subjects, which were also somewhat low and may also have contributed to the predictive differences for hypertension.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…55 y old at some sites are in line with the notion that high overall adiposity is not more associated with CVD in older than younger subjects. 1,44 In these populations and in West African men in particular, WC values were generally lower than those that have been described for Western populations. 10,21,45,46 The reason for this may due to the mean BMI values in these subjects, which were also somewhat low and may also have contributed to the predictive differences for hypertension.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The point of intersection between lines of speci®city and sensitivity identi®ed the highest numbers of subjects with and without hypertension. 1 We also calculated positive and negative predictive values of WC cut-off points for hypertension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, waist circumference acts as a good proxy for total abdominal fat, 9,10 and can be used satisfactorily as an indication of clinical risk. 11,12 Both lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) are positively correlated with height, hence to be most informative, comparisons between individuals require its confounding effect to be removed. In this paper, we use the term relative LM (or FM) to describe these body components after adjustment for height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 It is now well known that both body composition (lean and fat mass) and body fat distribution (the body shape) play a major role in causing morbidity and mortality. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] In particular, lower levels of muscle mass and subcutaneous fat are associated with an increased risk of cancer mortality; 26 excess intra-abdominal fat, as measured by large waist circumference (WC), is associated with an increased risk of developing a number of chronic diseases (including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease), 27,28 whereas larger hip circumference (HC) independently predicts good health and is associated with a better metabolic profile. [29][30][31] In order to obtain a more complete picture of the relationship between behavioural factors and body adiposity, we examined the association of socioeconomic and lifestyle factors with anthropometric estimates of overall fatness and regional (intra-abdominal and subcutaneous) fat accumulation adjusting for potential confounders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%