1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wackernagel affixes: evidence from Balto-Slavic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another phenomenon whose incidence is compatible with (if not predicted by) the micromorphology hypothesis is that of Wackernagel affixes (Nevis & Joseph 1993) -affixes that appear as the second morph in a word form, e.g., in the positions marked 'X' in the schemata in (40). ma-lɔm-ma-n ma-lɔm-ma-n-si-n ma-lɔm-ma-n-si-n 1du.incl a-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n -n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n a-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n 1du.excl ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-ŋa-n ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-si-ŋa-n ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-si-ŋa-n 1pl.incl a-n-lɔps-u-m-nɛn a-n-lɔps-u-m-si-m-nɛn a-n-lɔps-u-m-si-m-nɛn 1pl.excl ma-lɔps-u-m-ma-n ma-lɔps-u-m-si-m-ma-n ma-lɔps-u-m-si-m-ma-n 2sg ka-n-lɔps-u-n ka-n-lɔps-u-n-si-n ka-n-lɔps-u-n-si-n 2du ka-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n ka-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n ka-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n 2pl ka-n-lɔps-u-m-nɛn ka-n-lɔps-u-m-si-m-nɛn ka-n-lɔps-u-m-si-m-nɛn 3sg ma-lɔps-u-n ma-lɔps-u-n-si-n ma-lɔps-u-n-si-n 3du ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-n ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n 3pl ma-n-lɔps-u-n ma-n-lɔps-u-n-si-n ma-n-lɔps-u-n-si-n a Object a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Another phenomenon whose incidence is compatible with (if not predicted by) the micromorphology hypothesis is that of Wackernagel affixes (Nevis & Joseph 1993) -affixes that appear as the second morph in a word form, e.g., in the positions marked 'X' in the schemata in (40). ma-lɔm-ma-n ma-lɔm-ma-n-si-n ma-lɔm-ma-n-si-n 1du.incl a-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n -n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n a-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n 1du.excl ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-ŋa-n ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-si-ŋa-n ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-si-ŋa-n 1pl.incl a-n-lɔps-u-m-nɛn a-n-lɔps-u-m-si-m-nɛn a-n-lɔps-u-m-si-m-nɛn 1pl.excl ma-lɔps-u-m-ma-n ma-lɔps-u-m-si-m-ma-n ma-lɔps-u-m-si-m-ma-n 2sg ka-n-lɔps-u-n ka-n-lɔps-u-n-si-n ka-n-lɔps-u-n-si-n 2du ka-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n ka-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n ka-n-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n 2pl ka-n-lɔps-u-m-nɛn ka-n-lɔps-u-m-si-m-nɛn ka-n-lɔps-u-m-si-m-nɛn 3sg ma-lɔps-u-n ma-lɔps-u-n-si-n ma-lɔps-u-n-si-n 3du ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-n ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n ma-lɔm-cʰ-u-n-si-n 3pl ma-n-lɔps-u-n ma-n-lɔps-u-n-si-n ma-n-lɔps-u-n-si-n a Object a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(27) a. t-e-kohč-ay-os, *t-e-kohč-as-ay PAST-THEME-cut-REFL-1 *PAST-THEME-cut-1-REFL 'I cut (PAST) myself' b. t-e-kohč-as-ay-on, *t-e-kohč-ay-as-on PAST-THEME-cut-1-REFL-PL *PAST-THEME-cut-REFL-1-PL 'we cut (PAST) ourselves' A similar example can be found in Lithuanian (Senn 1966, Nevis & Joseph 1993, Embick & Noyer 2001, in which si 'reflexive' is a suffix, unless one or more of a certain class of prefixes is present, in which case si occurs as the second prefix, as in 28.…”
Section: Learning Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As an example of the latter, recall the case of nontransitivity in Lithuanian in 28 in which si 'reflexive' can either precede or follow the root, depending on whether a prefix (of a certain type) is present. According to Nevis and Joseph (1993), si was originally a second-position clitic, explaining its variable placement with respect to the root. If second-position clitics are uncommon, we would not expect this sort of situation to be morphologized often, even though it is entirely learnable when it is morphologized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of the reflexive morpheme -si in Standard Lithuanian (Senn 1966, Nevis andJoseph 1992) provides an important showcase for the interaction of Local Dislocations at the SWd level.…”
Section: The Lithuanian Reflexivementioning
confidence: 99%