Third Wave Feminism 2004
DOI: 10.1057/9780230523173_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wa(i)ving it All Away: Producing Subject and Knowledge in Feminisms of Colour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gaytri Spivak (2012) offers strategic essentialism to describe how one philosophically rejects the idea that identities are stable and homogenous, but acts as though they are stable essences for political purposes. This approach allows social groups to unite around shared identifications and find solidarity within Otherness (Nath Chakraborty, 2004). Strategic essentialism requires its practitioners to balance between the philosophical fluidity and the practical fixity of identity (Prasad, 2012).…”
Section: Postcolonial Theorizing In Organization Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaytri Spivak (2012) offers strategic essentialism to describe how one philosophically rejects the idea that identities are stable and homogenous, but acts as though they are stable essences for political purposes. This approach allows social groups to unite around shared identifications and find solidarity within Otherness (Nath Chakraborty, 2004). Strategic essentialism requires its practitioners to balance between the philosophical fluidity and the practical fixity of identity (Prasad, 2012).…”
Section: Postcolonial Theorizing In Organization Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Witt argues that this view can be compatible with the literature on intersectionality and gives the following example: ‘as Black feminists have noted, the issue of women in the workplace has an entirely different set of norms for Black women than it does for Caucasian women’ (Witt, 2011, p. 101). However, this argument is rather brief and it fails to engage with intersectionality’s criticism that there is a need ‘to account for lived experience at neglected points of intersection – ones that tended to reflect multiple subordinate locations as opposed to dominant or mixed locations’ (McCall, 2005, p. 1780), and more recent criticisms of what Mridula Nath Chakraborty calls ‘hegemonic feminism’ (Chakraborty, 2007). The notion of a ‘mega’ social role seems incompatible with the more nuanced accounts of intersectionality available.…”
Section: The Metaphysics Of Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spivak, 1987;Riley, 1988;Di Stefano, 1990;Braidotti, 1991Braidotti, , 1994Gatens, 1991;Butler, 1992;Stanley and Wise, 1993;Ramazanoğlu, 1995;Stanley, 1997;Smith 1997Smith , 1998. Feminists have been concerned with giving women a voice which includes being able to articulate women's experience in the first person in ways which include differences among women (hooks, 1984, Ramazanoğlu , 1989, Spivak 1987 and in the third wave Chakraborty, 2007or through intersectionality, Hill Collins, 1990[2000 and Taylor et al 2011)…”
Section: Ways Of Speakingmentioning
confidence: 99%