2009
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0907.2662
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

W_L W_L Scattering in Higgsless Models: Identifying Better Effective Theories

Alexander S. Belyaev,
R. Sekhar Chivukula,
Neil D. Christensen
et al.

Abstract: The three-site model has been offered as a benchmark for studying the collider phenomenology of Higgsless models. In this paper we analyze how well the three-site model performs as a general exemplar of Higgsless models in describing WLWL scattering, and which modifications can make it more representative. We employ general sum rules relating the masses and couplings of the Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes of the gauge fields in continuum and deconstructed Higgsless models as a way to compare the different theories. We… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…* ) This U(1) charge assignment causes non-local interactions when we consider the "continuum limit" of the model, however, it can be easily extended to "four-site" by adding an extra U(1) site to cure the problem. (See Ref 24). ) What we should emphasize here is that this U(1) charge assignment is perfectly consistent as a four-dimensional gauged non-linear sigma model.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…* ) This U(1) charge assignment causes non-local interactions when we consider the "continuum limit" of the model, however, it can be easily extended to "four-site" by adding an extra U(1) site to cure the problem. (See Ref 24). ) What we should emphasize here is that this U(1) charge assignment is perfectly consistent as a four-dimensional gauged non-linear sigma model.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…In the end, we emphasize that our formulation can be applicable to several types of HQCD models [5,6,32] and models including baryons [18,33]. It will also be interesting to apply our method to HQCD models in hot and/or dense matter [34], and furthermore so-called holographic (walking) technicolor models [35] and Higgsless models [36].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a vector state, the dominant production mechanism is the Drell-Yan process, q q → Z 1 , if there are sizable couplings to light quarks [13]. With highly suppressed couplings to light fermions as preferred in Higgsless models, the dominant production channel for Z 1 is commonly considered as the weak boson fusion (WBF) mechanism [5,6,14] pp → Z 1 jj. We extend the calculation by including the the associated production pp → W Z 1 .…”
Section: Z 1 At the Lhcmentioning
confidence: 99%