2006
DOI: 10.4086/toc.2006.v002a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: We consider the maximization version of the edge-disjoint path problem (EDP). In undirected graphs and directed acyclic graphs, we obtain an O(√ n) upper bound on the approximation ratio where n is the number of nodes in the graph. We show this by establishing the upper bound on the integrality gap of the natural relaxation based on multicommodity flows. Our upper bound matches within a constant factor a lower bound of Ω(√ n) that is known for both undirected and directed acyclic graphs. The best previous uppe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was later generalized to ufp by Srinivasan [19] and Baveja and Srinivasan [6] under no-bottleneck assumption: max i d i ≤ min e c e . More recently, Chekuri et al [9] improved these results to O( |V |)-approximation. On the other hand, Guruswami et al [14] proved that edp on directed graphs is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of Ω(|E| 1 2 −ǫ ) for any constant ǫ > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This was later generalized to ufp by Srinivasan [19] and Baveja and Srinivasan [6] under no-bottleneck assumption: max i d i ≤ min e c e . More recently, Chekuri et al [9] improved these results to O( |V |)-approximation. On the other hand, Guruswami et al [14] proved that edp on directed graphs is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of Ω(|E| 1 2 −ǫ ) for any constant ǫ > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Disjoint paths problems have also been studied intensively in the area of approximation algorithms, both on directed and undirected graphs (see, e.g., [9,18,2,5,8,4,6,10,7]). The goal is, given an input graph G and demands (s 1 , t 1 ), .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we consider the optimization problems MaxEDP and MaxNDP when the number of pairs is part of the input. In this setting, the best approximation ratio for MaxEDP is achieved by an -approximation algorithm [11, 35], that is, by an algorithm that routes pairs, where is the number of pairs in an optimum routing and n is the number of nodes. However, the best known lower bound for undirected graphs is only , assuming [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximability of MaxEDP/MaxNDP is currently not well understood; the best known lower bound is , assuming . This constitutes a significant gap to the best known approximation upper bound of due to Chekuri et al (Theory Comput 2:137–146, 2006), and closing this gap is currently one of the big open problems in approximation algorithms. In their seminal paper, Raghavan and Thompson (Combinatorica 7(4):365–374, 1987) introduce the technique of randomized rounding for LPs; their technique gives an -approximation when edges (or nodes) may be used by paths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%