2004
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-2-27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: BackgroundDendritic Cell (DC) vaccination is a very promising therapeutic strategy in cancer patients. The immunizing ability of DC is critically influenced by their migration activity to lymphatic tissues, where they have the task of priming naïve T-cells. In the present study in vivo DC migration was investigated within the context of a clinical trial of antitumor vaccination. In particular, we compared the migration activity of mature Dendritic Cells (mDC) with that of immature Dendritic Cells (iDC) and als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the kinetic of DC migration after intratumoral injection DCs were labeled with 111 In that is suitable for analysis of DC migration 27 . The maximum duration of observation of DC migratory activity depends on the half-life of the radioisotope (72 hr).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the kinetic of DC migration after intratumoral injection DCs were labeled with 111 In that is suitable for analysis of DC migration 27 . The maximum duration of observation of DC migratory activity depends on the half-life of the radioisotope (72 hr).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a clinical trial of DC for cancer therapy, it was verified that radiolabeled DC injected intradermally had a higher migration rate to lymph nodes than DC injected subcutaneously. Also, mature DC showed greater migratory activity than immature DC [119]. In these studies, DC were detected in lymph nodes 20–60 min after injection, and the maximum concentration was reached after 48–72 h. Although the purpose of this study was to induce immunostimulatory (rather than tolerogenic) effects, the observations highlight the possible effect of phenotypic maturation on the migratory capacity of the injected DC.…”
Section: Critical Factors Related To Clinical DC Therapymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the basic biology of mo-DCs remains uncovered, and vaccines based on mo-DCs still display a limited efficacy. One major bottleneck is the reduced migratory capacity of mo-DCs relative to the highly mobile natural DCs [3]. The clinical efficacy of these mo-DC-based vaccines lies in the accomplishment of two important steps: i) exit from the bloodstream to the tissue space and ii) subsequent homing to the draining lymph nodes, where antigen-specific T-cell stimulation takes place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%