2007
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

W‐shaped diastolic Doppler waveform in the hepatic artery of a patient with acute rejection after living donor liver transplantation

Abstract: Waveform analysis of arterial Doppler sonography signals is widely used in clinical practice. A characteristic, W-shaped diastolic waveform has been reported in the renal artery of renal transplant recipients in cases of renal vein thrombosis or severe acute rejection. Although Doppler sonography is widely used for the evaluation of liver transplants, we found no report of this waveform in cases of outflow block or severe acute rejection. We report the case of a patient with an adult living-donor liver transpl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absence of this retrograde flow has been associated with venous stenosis and acute graft rejection. [21][22][23] All three blood flow patterns (triphasic, biphasic and monophasic waveforms) were detected in the hepatic veins of liver recipients after transplantation without complications in the present study. The proportions of monophasic waveforms found in the right, middle and left hepatic veins were 32.6%, 34.7% and 22.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Absence of this retrograde flow has been associated with venous stenosis and acute graft rejection. [21][22][23] All three blood flow patterns (triphasic, biphasic and monophasic waveforms) were detected in the hepatic veins of liver recipients after transplantation without complications in the present study. The proportions of monophasic waveforms found in the right, middle and left hepatic veins were 32.6%, 34.7% and 22.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%