“…In fact, a significant canon of CRT research from the United Kingdom has been foundational in advancing understandings of CRT's critique of White supremacy (Chadderton, 2012;Gillborn, 2005Gillborn, , 2006aGillborn, , 2006bGillborn, , 2017, raceclass relations in British schools (Gillborn et al, 2012), the experiences of Black Caribbean and ethnic minoritized groups relative to educational systems and policy (Gillborn, 2008;Gillborn et al, 2017), and of CRT's conceptual capabilities to inform race methodology in educational research (Hylton, 2012). CRT has also advanced beyond the United Kingdom to contextualize racism in continental European (Möschel, 2011), Filipino (Viola, 2009(Viola, , 2016, Indian (Goodnight, 2017;Pazich & Teranishi, 2012), and Chinese contexts (Zhu et al, 2019). In tandem with studies from Australian contexts which employ a more intersectional and gendered orientation toward CRT (Alamri, 2015;Andrews, 2000), it is evident that CRT on a global scale has been adopted to inform analyses of ethnic, caste, and class differences.…”