This paper explores how different discursive sites have sought to define
and/or deny the actuality and harm of child sexual abuse in the first half
of the twentieth century in England and Wales. Primary data from journal
and archival sources suggest that there were a range of competing
accounts of sexual abuse (usually referred to as sexual assaults or even
just as ‘outrages’). It is argued that there was not a monolithic silencing
of this abuse but a contest over the meaning of childhood, over the sexual
innocence of girls, and even over the significance of discovering venereal
diseases in babies and in children's homes. The paper suggests that
there has been an overemphasis on the silencing potential of psychoanalytic
discourses during this period, and insufficient attention paid to the
role of the legal establishment and the practices of the criminal justice
system in the persistent, but multifaceted, inability to define adult/child
sexual contact as abusive or harmful.