2006
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2006.023168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulvovaginal candidiasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, women infected with Candida may have discharge caused by bacterial vaginosis and could thus be misdiagnosed with vulvovaginal candidiasis [36]. Our findings emphasize the problems inherent in making diagnoses of vaginal conditions based on clinical examination alone [34, 37, 38]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For example, women infected with Candida may have discharge caused by bacterial vaginosis and could thus be misdiagnosed with vulvovaginal candidiasis [36]. Our findings emphasize the problems inherent in making diagnoses of vaginal conditions based on clinical examination alone [34, 37, 38]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…On the basis of the severity of symptoms, frequency, causative agents and host factors, VVC is usually classified as either uncomplicated or complicated 1 2. Approximately 10–20% of women will have complicated VVC 13. The diagnosis and classification of different conditions of VVC are important for therapy 47 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, Schwiertz et al reported a rate of misjudgment of VVC by physicians of 77% on the basis of clinical evidence alone (32). Microbiologic testing for episodic VVC is recommended for patients with mild to moderate symptoms and no history of persistent or recurrent infection (41), and women are generally considered to have VVC when vaginal specimens are positive for yeasts by both microscopy and culture. The signs and symptoms of VVC have been reported to be more severe in women with yeast counts of Ͼ10 3 CFU/ml, whereas lower counts of Ͻ10 2 CFU/ml are taken to indicate colonization (16), although this relationship has been questioned by some authors (3,9,26,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%