2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma development after diagnosis of VIN increases with age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

13
158
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
13
158
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[36][37][38][39][40] Notably, HPV-induced vulvar carcinomas are known for their good overall prognosis and survival rate of approximately 80%. 41,42 In the current study, the increased presence of single CD141 cells, representative for M1 macrophages, was related to a decreased RFS but so was the number of all intraepithelial CD141 cells, comprising both M1 and M2 macrophages. Most notably, in uVIN the increase in one myeloid cell population coincided with the increase in all other myeloid populations (Supporting Information Table S1) as well as with intraepithelial CD41 regulatory T cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…[36][37][38][39][40] Notably, HPV-induced vulvar carcinomas are known for their good overall prognosis and survival rate of approximately 80%. 41,42 In the current study, the increased presence of single CD141 cells, representative for M1 macrophages, was related to a decreased RFS but so was the number of all intraepithelial CD141 cells, comprising both M1 and M2 macrophages. Most notably, in uVIN the increase in one myeloid cell population coincided with the increase in all other myeloid populations (Supporting Information Table S1) as well as with intraepithelial CD41 regulatory T cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…In general, several studies showed that patients with uVINrelated vulvar SCC are younger than dVIN/LS-related vulvar SCC patients (Hording et al, 1994;Hampl et al, 2006;Hoevenaars et al, 2008;van de Nieuwenhof et al, 2009a). In our study, we confirm this observation with a significant difference in age distribution between the two different groups, 72 years for the hrHPVunrelated and 54 years for the hrHPV-related groups (Po0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This emphasises the concept that a patient with a hrHPV-related ano-genital (pre)malignancy is at a higher risk to develop another hrHPVrelated (pre)malignancy. We previously reported that 41% of uVIN patients had a past, simultaneous or future HPV-induced cervical, vaginal or anal lesion (van de Nieuwenhof et al, 2009a). Unfortunately, in this cohort of vulvar SCC patients, we were not able to retrieve data about other multicentric sites of the lower female ano-genital tract prone to hrHPV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The nuclear chromatin is vesicular rather than coarse, and the nuclei have prominent nucleoli (Figure 3e), usually most prominently in the basal and parabasal keratinocytes. 8 Although differentiated VIN is seen adjacent to B80% of vulvar squamous cell carcinomas, 2 it is seldom diagnosed as a solitary lesion, 10 which may be explained by underdiagnosis due to its difficult recognition [11][12][13] or due to its short intraepithelial phase. 10 It has been hypothesized that differentiated VIN may develop from lichen sclerosus and that it carries a higher malignant potential than lichen sclerosus does, 3,13-17 but its role as a premalignant lesion has not been accepted by all pathologists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Although differentiated VIN is seen adjacent to B80% of vulvar squamous cell carcinomas, 2 it is seldom diagnosed as a solitary lesion, 10 which may be explained by underdiagnosis due to its difficult recognition [11][12][13] or due to its short intraepithelial phase. 10 It has been hypothesized that differentiated VIN may develop from lichen sclerosus and that it carries a higher malignant potential than lichen sclerosus does, 3,13-17 but its role as a premalignant lesion has not been accepted by all pathologists. 18 We hypothesize that of all lesions that have been diagnosed as lichen sclerosus in the past, a substantial part might currently be diagnosed as differentiated VIN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%