2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22124614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerable Road Users and Connected Autonomous Vehicles Interaction: A Survey

Abstract: There is a group of users within the vehicular traffic ecosystem known as Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs). VRUs include pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists, among others. On the other hand, connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) are a set of technologies that combines, on the one hand, communication technologies to stay always ubiquitous connected, and on the other hand, automated technologies to assist or replace the human driver during the driving process. Autonomous vehicles are being visualized as a viable alt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 207 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The base of the CAVs–VRU interaction is to predict what other users (cyclists, scooters, pedestrians, motorcyclists, and drivers, among others) intend to do next to make a proper movement decision [ 141 ]. CAVs will not only detect objects but also predict the behavior of other users and notify their intention to the rest of the road users [ 142 ]. For example, in [ 143 ], the authors explain that the interaction without non-verbal communication occurs through two stages: (i) Communication of awareness describes the entire process that must be carried out for the CAVs to detect and identify the VRUs.…”
Section: Discussion and Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The base of the CAVs–VRU interaction is to predict what other users (cyclists, scooters, pedestrians, motorcyclists, and drivers, among others) intend to do next to make a proper movement decision [ 141 ]. CAVs will not only detect objects but also predict the behavior of other users and notify their intention to the rest of the road users [ 142 ]. For example, in [ 143 ], the authors explain that the interaction without non-verbal communication occurs through two stages: (i) Communication of awareness describes the entire process that must be carried out for the CAVs to detect and identify the VRUs.…”
Section: Discussion and Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Communication of intent describes the capabilities of the CAVs to notify the VRUs of their next action (stopping or not stopping for the pedestrian). In [ 142 ], the authors consider that a third stage is necessary, called broadcast communication , which describes the different types of communication between the CAVs and the roadside units, infrastructures, VRUs, and other CAVs.…”
Section: Discussion and Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AVs can detect and classify objects in the vicinity and can notify the driver and other road users about the situation with respect to, for example, pedestrian detection state (pedestrians with intention to cross, pedestrians that stop suddenly or start running), detection of a traffic signal, and detection of objects on the road, among others. AVs can take real-time control of certain operations with the aim of avoiding accidents [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considering human-AV interactions in designing AV controllers is critical for ensuring the safety of passengers and the surrounding traffic; AVs that behave in a socially compliant manner enable human drivers to comprehend their actions and respond appropriately . Such interactions could be even more pivotal to consider when it comes to vulnerable road users as safety is the top priority of transportation systems [Reyes-Muñoz and Guerrero-Ibáñez, 2022].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%