2017
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2017.1344646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability to Multi-Dimensional Poverty: An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Measurement Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our goal is to focus on this state in order to highlight the performance of 27 municipalities directly or indirectly affected by sector-based projects. The analysis is based on georeferentiated data (Lelo, 2011) from the last IBGE ‡ ‡ census (1991, 2000 and 2010) and takes three indicators into account: the income per capita, the percentage of population vulnerable to poverty and the inequality (Sen, 2005;Ehrhart, 2009;Azeem et al, 2017;Santos et al, 2017;Menshikov et al, 2017 The more recent the year, the higher the income per capita in all groups. However, the data shows better results in terms of income increase than in terms of decrease of vulnerability to poverty.…”
Section: National Programmes Between Economic Growth and Human Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to focus on this state in order to highlight the performance of 27 municipalities directly or indirectly affected by sector-based projects. The analysis is based on georeferentiated data (Lelo, 2011) from the last IBGE ‡ ‡ census (1991, 2000 and 2010) and takes three indicators into account: the income per capita, the percentage of population vulnerable to poverty and the inequality (Sen, 2005;Ehrhart, 2009;Azeem et al, 2017;Santos et al, 2017;Menshikov et al, 2017 The more recent the year, the higher the income per capita in all groups. However, the data shows better results in terms of income increase than in terms of decrease of vulnerability to poverty.…”
Section: National Programmes Between Economic Growth and Human Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Gloede et al evaluated more than 4000 households in Thailand and Vietnam to measure the degree of risk for household poverty [27], while Gallardo et al adopted the multidimensional poverty vulnerability measurement approach based on mean risk behavior to analyze Chile's vulnerability to poverty using the multidimensional poverty vulnerability index (MPVI) [28]. Azeem et al compared the ex-post poverty and the ex-ante vulnerability to poverty of households and considered that most vulnerable households could be accurately identified through ex-ante measures of vulnerability to poverty [29]. Omotoso et al focused on the issue of child poverty and believed that vulnerable "non-poverty-stricken" children were more vulnerable to poverty than children living in chronic poverty [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, defining vulnerability as the insight to poverty status in at least one period in the future and for forecasting trend (Pritchett, Suryahadi and Sumarto 2000;Feeny & McDonald, 2016), by considering risk profiles using expected low utility (Ligon and Schecter2003), and by describing the dynamic nature of this concept regarding future macroeconomic shocks (Glewwe and Hall 1998;Alfani et al, 2019). The choice to measure is essential when examing the ex-post poverty, but it is not as important when analyzing the ex-ante vulnerability with respect to poverty (Azeem et al, 2018).…”
Section: Background and Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%