2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-022-01395-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability prediction model of typical structures considering empirical seismic damage observation data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damage to artificial structures caused by earthquakes has long been a matter of concern, and earthquakes of different intensities significantly impact human production and life [1,2]. Macroseismic vulnerability and seismic damage are important issues in the field of seismic safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage to artificial structures caused by earthquakes has long been a matter of concern, and earthquakes of different intensities significantly impact human production and life [1,2]. Macroseismic vulnerability and seismic damage are important issues in the field of seismic safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been hundreds of Ms 7 EQs worldwide from 2000 to now [1]. EQs cause direct damage to the buildings in the residential areas in the center of the EQ and cause different levels of damage to buildings of different materials and structures [2,3]. Secondary disasters such as tsunamis and landslides triggered by EQs cause enormous human casualties, construction damages, and property losses [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vation of Iran (SOSRI) [16], the SAARC Disaster Management Center (SDMC) [17], and churches [18][19][20][21]. In addition to the RVS methods established nationally or institutionally, there has been extensive research carried out on the development [22][23][24], implementation [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], enhancement [1,32,33], and review [34][35][36] of conventional RVS methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%