2018
DOI: 10.4102/abc.v48i2.2327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability of vulture populations to elephant impacts in KwaZulu-Natal

Abstract: Elephant were previously widespread in savanna and coastal systems of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), but were virtually extirpated by 1870. Over time, elephant have been reintroduced into their former range in KZN, but always onto small fenced systems (mean size 191.3 km2 ± 87.8 km2, median size 107.0 km2, range 14 km2 – 900 km2). These populations have increased rapidly (8.4% per annum), and although a number of populations are now being managed using contraception, the majority of the populations (66.7%, 14 out of 21)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elephants introduced into an area to increase tourism potential may compromise other conservation objectives. Rushworth et al (2018) highlight the complexities of managing elephants in small areas, while at the same time seeking to conserve highly threatened vulture populations. Blackmore and Trouwborst (2018) explore the evolution of South African regulatory jurisprudence applicable to wildlife and analyse the norms and standards in relation to international and national legislation and common law as it applies to elephants.…”
Section: Read Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elephants introduced into an area to increase tourism potential may compromise other conservation objectives. Rushworth et al (2018) highlight the complexities of managing elephants in small areas, while at the same time seeking to conserve highly threatened vulture populations. Blackmore and Trouwborst (2018) explore the evolution of South African regulatory jurisprudence applicable to wildlife and analyse the norms and standards in relation to international and national legislation and common law as it applies to elephants.…”
Section: Read Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sub‐Saharan savannah, elephants actively promote herbaceous vegetation cover and increase landscape openness by reducing tree and shrub density and canopy size (Guldemond et al, 2017), which should indirectly impact fauna by selecting for species that prefer “open” rather than “closed” savannah (Gordon et al, 2021; Nasseri et al, 2011). By breaking tree branches and toppling trees, elephants are thought to promote herbaceous plant cover/diversity through nursery effects (Coverdale et al, 2016); however, they may compromise the abundance of some larger tree species, which may then negatively affect fauna requiring larger trees (Rushworth et al, 2018). Elephants’ impacts on tree persistence also moderates the amount of coarse woody debris, which may impact fire regimes (Kimuyu et al, 2014) and advantage smaller mammalian fauna, such as rodents or lagomorphs, by creating habitat refugia (Manning et al, 2013) but disadvantage larger species such as antelope by reducing predator detection (Kuijper et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees are integral to ecosystem functioning in savannas as they provide food and habitat for animals (Dean et al, 1999; Rushworth et al, 2018) and play an important role in increasing local nutrient pools (Belsky et al, 1993; Ludwig et al, 2001, 2003; Treydte et al, 2009). The continued loss of tall trees in African savannas, especially those taller than 5 m, is a topic that receives much attention (Davies et al, 2018; Levick & Asner, 2013; O'Connor & Goodall, 2017; Shannon et al, 2008, 2011; Smit et al, 2010; Vanak et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%