2007
DOI: 10.1186/1476-072x-6-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability of populations and the urban health care systems to nuclear weapon attack – examples from four American cities

Abstract: Background: The threat posed by the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) within the United States has grown significantly in recent years, focusing attention on the medical and public health disaster capabilities of the nation in a large scale crisis. While the hundreds of thousands or millions of casualties resulting from a nuclear weapon would, in and of itself, overwhelm our current medical response capabilities, the response dilemma is further exacerbated in that these resources themselves would be sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been noted in previous publications by this group that the mass thermal burn casualties expected with nuclear weapons are going to be very difficult to treat [1,2]. Typical burn care management involves a high ratio of medical personnel to patients, which can be accommodated when there are only a few burn victims at a time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been noted in previous publications by this group that the mass thermal burn casualties expected with nuclear weapons are going to be very difficult to treat [1,2]. Typical burn care management involves a high ratio of medical personnel to patients, which can be accommodated when there are only a few burn victims at a time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the impact of nuclear weapon use on American cities has revealed the shocking outcome in mortality and morbidity in densely occupied urban areas. Nuclear weapons with larger than 100 Kt yields were found to generate predominantly thermal and fallout radiation casualties, able to cause burns and generate fires at distances considerably greater than building damage, and to spread lethal levels of fallout for many kilometers, causing radiation casualties many kilometers downwind from detonation [1,2]. The key factors in the dramatic differences in impact of an Iranian/Israeli nuclear exchange will be the lower fission yields, numbers of weapons, and less accurate targeting of the Iranian forces relative to the Israeli nuclear capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of such an event predict that upwards of one million people will be affected and require evaluation of their personal radiation exposure levels, and hundreds of thousands of people may receive doses over 2 Gy (Grace et al 2010, Bell and Dallas 2007, Meade and Molander 2006, Buddemeier and Dillon 2009). In addition to the exposure to prompt radiation and fallout, casualties and infrastructure damage due to over-pressure, thermal, and electromagnetic effects will be overwhelming in the 1-mile radius area surrounding the detonation site.…”
Section: Definition Of the Emergency Needs For Biodosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, injured individuals (or others such as children or people with unrelated health problems) may require assessment at levels accurate below 2 Gy. Second, the blast and associated dangers are likely to produce mass fear and confusion, mass exodus with unknown destinations for people who are mobile, difficulty in transporting victims and products out of the area or devices and emergency personnel into the area, severely compromised local health care capabilities along with destruction of medical records and credentials of medical personnel, and severely damaged infrastructures such as buildings to use for triage and treatment, power and water, and communication networks (Gougelet et al 2010; Bell and Dallas 2007). …”
Section: Contexts For Evaluating Biodosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%