2017
DOI: 10.3390/w9060394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability of Buildings on Coastal Dikes due to Wave Overtopping

Abstract: Abstract:The vulnerability of buildings on coastal dikes due to overtopping wave impacts is difficult to assess. A method is developed in this paper to quantify the vulnerability of masonry buildings on a coastal dike exposed to wave overtopping. Using previous studies, the accidental loads due to the extreme wave impacts are characterized. Using the approach from Eurocode 6, the strength of masonry buildings under these loads is assessed. Results from a case study in Belgium show that masonry buildings locate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overtopping flow can be changed by the interaction with structures. When overtopping is severe, overtopping waves can destroy the facade (i.e., the first defense of the dwellings/apartment buildings, such as windows, see examples in [13]), waves can propagate further even inside buildings. Then, the wave will be reflected to the seaward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overtopping flow can be changed by the interaction with structures. When overtopping is severe, overtopping waves can destroy the facade (i.e., the first defense of the dwellings/apartment buildings, such as windows, see examples in [13]), waves can propagate further even inside buildings. Then, the wave will be reflected to the seaward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the developed frameworks address different aspects, like the identification of the degree of spatial and structural integration (Ellen et al, 2011b;Voorendt, 2017;Van Veelen et al, 2015), the identification of costs and benefits (Anvarifar et al, 2013), the identification of the threats and opportunities (Anvarifar et al, 2017), and the identification and evaluation of flexibility for MFFDs (Anvarifar et al, 2016). Other studies on MFFDs tend to only focus on the effects of a specific multifunctional element or failure mechanism (Chen et al, 2017;Bomers et al, 2018;Zanetti et al, 2011). Only recently was an assessment framework specifically for hybrid naturebased flood defences put forward, accounting for multiple failures by putting vegetation-specific equations directly into the assessment procedure (Vuik et al, 2018).…”
Section: Synthesizing a Risk-based Approach To Mffd Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main aim is to prove that overtopping flow characteristics and wave forces are modelled correctly and that the hybridization can represent a reliable solution that can be used as complementary or alternative to physical (Belgium) to measure forces on the vertical wall (i.e. building), the layer thickness and velocities of the overtopping flows [103]. The geometrical layout is depicted in Figure 11: the foreshore slope was 1:35 and dike height 0.1 m. The dike slope was 1:3.…”
Section: Test Case Nmentioning
confidence: 99%