Vulnerability in Health Care: A Concept Analysis

Abstract

This article introduces the concept of vulnerability in health care and explores the extant literature to determine its tenets. The debate over what constitutes ethical research is centered in part on the concept of vulnerability. The Belmont Report (National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1978), the first human research ethics guideline to identify vulnerable groups, specified that those identified as vulnerable need extra protections during research participation. Identified limitations of the Belmont Report, especially with regard to racial minorities, led to the Heckler Report (Heckler, M. M., & U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1985), which laid the foundation for actionable steps to eliminate health disparities among racial and ethnic minority groups. The American Nurses Association's Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements (American Nurses Association, 2015), requires nurses to promote, advocate, and strive to protect the health, safety, and rights of all individuals and groups. A conceptual understanding of vulnerability allows nurses and researchers to advocate for and better serve individuals and groups deemed vulnerable. Nurse advocacy is paramount in reducing health disparities and improving health outcomes among vulnerable groups.

Eventos toxicológicos em filhos e familiares de mulheres com histórico de uso de álcool e outras drogas: análise das dimensões de vulnerabilidade

“…Ficou demonstrado nos resultados do estudo que, estas participantes dispunham de pouca rede de apoio, círculo social restrito, possivelmente justificado pelas situações em que familiares faziam uso de álcool e outras drogas e relações intrafamiliares de agressões abusivas em decorrência do uso de drogas. Portanto, pessoas são vulneráveis quando não possuem meios para superar os riscos a que estão expostos, não conseguem desenvolver para que alcancem um nível mínimo de segurança pessoal e coletiva (PADOVEZE et al, 2019, GATHRON, 2019, MAGNABOSCO, 2023.…”

Do genomic passports leave us more vulnerable or less vulnerable? Perspectives from an online citizen engagement

“…The Discussion section aims to put light on vulnerability as a latent and shared experience in the context of genomics because this particular type of vulnerability has not received the attention it deserves within the literature, especially not from the perspective of citizens. Researchers in ethics have thoroughly engaged with the ethical concerns surrounding patient groups who are particularly vulnerable (Gathron, 2019 ; McCormack et al, 2016 ). However, this conception of vulnerability did not map well onto our analysis since the type of vulnerability we encountered is not linked to groups of citizens who are a priori characterised as particularly vulnerable.…”

Influence of the COVID‐19 pandemic on executive skills in Canadians experiencing social vulnerability: A descriptive study

“…Socially vulnerable individuals and families are likely to be disproportionally impacted by the pandemic (Douglas et al., 2020 ; Siegel & Mallow, 2021 ; Wilke et al., 2020 ). For the purpose of this paper, social vulnerability was defined as living with low income, physical and mental illnesses, addictions, disability, family conflict and violence, risk of homelessness and social isolation, and often involvement in the legal system (Gathron, 2019 ). The path to social vulnerability and resilience is different for each individual and family and may include an intergenerational accumulation of risks (Lê‐Scherban et al., 2018 ).…”