2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0327-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability assessments and their planning implications: a case study of the Hutt Valley, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, ecological vulnerability evaluations can be combined with ecological security, pollution management, disaster resistance and insurance, and also provide a theoretical basis and reference for the development of the regional environment. Ecological vulnerability evaluation has developed rapidly in recent years, and many theories and methods have been proposed, such as the multi-index comprehensive evaluation method (Zhou et al 2011;Duguy et al 2012), the fuzzy evaluation method (Farshad et al 2013;Aryafar et al 2013), the artificial neural network evaluation method (Dzeroski 2001;Kia et al 2012), the landscape evaluation method (Kangas et al 2000;Antonio et al 2003;Salvati et al 2013), the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method (Huang et al 2010;Song et al 2010), and the principal component analysis method (Khan 2012). GIS and remote sensing technologies have become powerful tools for index acquisition and spatial distribution mapping for ecological vulnerability studies (Babiker et al 2005;Saidi et al 2010; Bagdanavičiūt_ e and Valiūnas 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, ecological vulnerability evaluations can be combined with ecological security, pollution management, disaster resistance and insurance, and also provide a theoretical basis and reference for the development of the regional environment. Ecological vulnerability evaluation has developed rapidly in recent years, and many theories and methods have been proposed, such as the multi-index comprehensive evaluation method (Zhou et al 2011;Duguy et al 2012), the fuzzy evaluation method (Farshad et al 2013;Aryafar et al 2013), the artificial neural network evaluation method (Dzeroski 2001;Kia et al 2012), the landscape evaluation method (Kangas et al 2000;Antonio et al 2003;Salvati et al 2013), the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method (Huang et al 2010;Song et al 2010), and the principal component analysis method (Khan 2012). GIS and remote sensing technologies have become powerful tools for index acquisition and spatial distribution mapping for ecological vulnerability studies (Babiker et al 2005;Saidi et al 2010; Bagdanavičiūt_ e and Valiūnas 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vulnerability assessment frameworks as a policy tool identified not only the specific areas needing immediate attention but also the hotspots in which efforts could be made to reduce vulnerability to anticipated climate change impacts [3,23,25,26]. Undertaking this propensity will allow us to identify particular measurements for constructing resilience when coping with the disturbance and impacts [3,26,27].…”
Section: Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undertaking this propensity will allow us to identify particular measurements for constructing resilience when coping with the disturbance and impacts [3,26,27].…”
Section: Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social vulnerability, a universal standard, is applied when managing disasters and climate change in certain regions [22]. It is related to the specific context of a certain area.…”
Section: Environmental Change and Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%