2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijcis.2011.045065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability analysis of interdependent critical infrastructures: case study of the Swedish railway system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Blizzards and heavy storms have a geographical extension and often disrupt more than one mode of transport and possibly other infrastructure systems. There are some studies attempting to analyse geographically extended effects (Jenelius and Mattsson, 2012) and interrelationships within and between systems with applications to track-based systems (Johansson et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2014) and to road systems (Hémond and Robert, 2010;Hsieh and Feng, 2014). Further methodological development in this respect seems to be an interesting avenue of future research.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blizzards and heavy storms have a geographical extension and often disrupt more than one mode of transport and possibly other infrastructure systems. There are some studies attempting to analyse geographically extended effects (Jenelius and Mattsson, 2012) and interrelationships within and between systems with applications to track-based systems (Johansson et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2014) and to road systems (Hémond and Robert, 2010;Hsieh and Feng, 2014). Further methodological development in this respect seems to be an interesting avenue of future research.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also three important perspectives of vulnerability analysis: global vulnerability analysis (Johansson et al, 2007), critical component analysis and critical geographical locations analysis (Wang et al, 2013). Considering infrastructures are always distributed in a wide spatial range, Johansson et al (2011) propose geographical vulnerability analysis to study the spatially oriented vulnerability involved.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic theory based approaches regard each infrastructure system as an entity in a market of economy and then model their interdependencies by economic models, such as input-output models and computable general equilibrium models, which enable to analytically study how perturbations propagate among interconnected infrastructures and how to implement effective mitigation efforts [33][34][35][36][37]. The network based approaches model each involved system by a network and describe their interdependencies by interlinks, which enable to describe the topological features of interdependent systems and flow characteristics upon systems, identify the critical system components and provide suggestions on mitigation strategies at detailed topological levels [38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. However, these studies mainly considered negative effects of interdependencies, where failures in one system can propagate to other systems and aggravate the initial damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%