Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3349263.3351511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VRoad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conducted questionnaires to assess level of immersion and simulation sickness showed little to no discomfort in user feedbacks [14,16,19]. Some participants experienced increased discomfort [16] but no abortions were documented [14,17,19]. The time spent in the VR was documented between 20 and 40 minutes which is within the recommended limits stated by [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Conducted questionnaires to assess level of immersion and simulation sickness showed little to no discomfort in user feedbacks [14,16,19]. Some participants experienced increased discomfort [16] but no abortions were documented [14,17,19]. The time spent in the VR was documented between 20 and 40 minutes which is within the recommended limits stated by [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The studies showed a typical western urban environment from a pedestrian's point of view showing at least all relevant characteristics of a street (i.e., sideways, lane markings) and some building structures. The lack of descripted devices used in [17] in addition to an unspecified hardware failure makes this study in terms of hardware specification difficult to compare. Aligned with user feedback across all studies, the immersive experience can be described as positive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations