2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VRE fecal colonization/infection in cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies from larger centers have reported highly variable VRE colonization rates in HSCT recipients ranging from 5% to 27%, although the rates of VRE bacteremia among colonized patients was similar: approximately 30% across all studies [5,10,11]. A previous study from MSKCC (between August 2004 and February 2006) showed a colonization rate of 29%; 27 among 92 HSCT recipients screened prior to transplant were VRE colonized, and 34% of all colonized persons developed VREB early (within first 35 days) after HSCT [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies from larger centers have reported highly variable VRE colonization rates in HSCT recipients ranging from 5% to 27%, although the rates of VRE bacteremia among colonized patients was similar: approximately 30% across all studies [5,10,11]. A previous study from MSKCC (between August 2004 and February 2006) showed a colonization rate of 29%; 27 among 92 HSCT recipients screened prior to transplant were VRE colonized, and 34% of all colonized persons developed VREB early (within first 35 days) after HSCT [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rolston and colleagues 19 looked at patients with hematologic malignancies and found that VRE colonization had a positive predictive value of 29.3% (29/99) for VRE bacteremia and a negative predictive value of 99.9% (2014/2016). Kim and colleagues 27 described a prospective study in an intensive care unit in which 9.2% (17/184) of VRE-colonized patients experienced VRE sterile-site infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Previous studies have evaluated the predictive value of VRE screening swabs in forecasting the prevalence of VRE among all causes of bacterial infection. [15][16][17][18][19] In this study, we sought to investigate the utility of results obtained with VRE screening swabs in predicting vancomycin resistance among subsequent sterile-site infections with Enterococcus. We hypothesized that among patients with sterile-site Enterococcus infections, prior positive results with VRE screening swabs would reliably predict vancomycin resistance, but prior negative results would not reliably rule out vancomycin resistance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies described rates of early bacteremia with VRE ranging between 3% and 22% and mortality rates varying between 1% and 80% . Rates of VRE bacteremia among colonized patients account for approximately 30% in several analyses . Recently, Bilinski et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%