Vox Populi, Vox ChatGPT: Large Language Models, Education and Democracy

Abstract

In the era of generative AI and specifically large language models (LLMs), exemplified by ChatGPT, the intersection of artificial intelligence and human reasoning has become a focal point of global attention. Unlike conventional search engines, LLMs go beyond mere information retrieval, entering into the realm of discourse culture. Their outputs mimic well-considered, independent opinions or statements of facts, presenting a pretense of wisdom. This paper explores the potential transformative impact of LLMs on democratic societies. It delves into the concerns regarding the difficulty in distinguishing ChatGPT-generated texts from human output. The discussion emphasizes the essence of authorship, rooted in the unique human capacity for reason—a quality indispensable for democratic discourse and successful collaboration within free societies. Highlighting the potential threats to democracy, this paper presents three arguments: the Substitution argument, the Authenticity argument, and the Facts argument. These arguments highlight the potential risks that are associated with an overreliance on LLMs. The central thesis posits that widespread deployment of LLMs may adversely affect the fabric of a democracy if not comprehended and addressed proactively and properly. In proposing a solution, we advocate for an emphasis on education as a means to mitigate risks. We suggest cultivating thinking skills in children, fostering coherent thought formulation, and distinguishing between machine-generated output and genuine, i.e., human, reasoning. The focus should be on the responsible development and usage of LLMs, with the goal of augmenting human capacities in thinking, deliberating and decision-making rather than substituting them.

From SOFT approach to SWOT analysis, a historical reconstruction

“…In this era, we are witnessing the instantaneous generation of responses to inquiries, thereby diminishing the opportunity for source verification. There is a real danger of creating echo chambers (Ohagi, 2024;Zuber and Gogoll, 2024) in which we change from the old paradigm of strategic management to a new paradigm according to the rules of old, in which we will conserve and perpetuate academic myths, misconceptions and lies (De Bruyckere et al, 2015;Mandard, 2022;Rekdal, 2014).…”