Vox clamantis in deserto: a survey among Italian psychiatrists on defensive medicine and professional liability

Abstract

Due to recent events, professional liability for psychiatrists in Italy is currently a matter of lively debate. Specifically, overwhelming pressure on psychiatrists’ duties has been brought by regulatory developments, such as the closure of forensic psychiatric hospitals, with the consequent return of offenders to community-based care, and the mental health consequences of the pandemic. According to Italian courts, psychiatrists are not only responsible for diagnostic and therapeutic appropriateness but also for the effects of their interventions on patients, and their behaviors. The aim of this study was to explore the attitude and behaviors of Italian psychiatrists regarding defensive medicine and professional liability. A total sample of 254 psychiatrists was surveyed by means of a quantitative online questionnaire. Most psychiatrists reported practicing defensive medicine (no. 153/254, 60.2%) and felt that their position of guarantee compromised their work in healthcare for patients (no. 138/253, 54.3%). Age correlated inversely with acknowledgment of defensive practices (r = −0.245, p < 0.001), with younger physicians more prone to defensive medicine (p = 0.013), particularly for patients at risk of suicide or violence. Psychiatrists in ‘closed’ settings (hospital wards, residential and rehabilitation centers, mental health service units in prison) reported more malpractice claims (p = 0.037) and complaints (p = 0.031), as well as a greater propensity to act defensively. In the treatment of patients with violent behavior, suicidal ideation, dual diagnoses, and criminal convictions, defensive practices were associated more with perceived legal risks (r = 0.306, p < 0.001) than actual legal involvement (p > 0.05). Anxiety, anger, and restlessness were common reactions to legal complaints, involving no. 50/254 (19.7%) respondents, with 40% reporting impaired functioning. Most psychiatrists (no. 175/253, 68.9%) were concerned about both civil and criminal laws regarding their professional responsibility, but many were not fully informed about recent legislative regulations and younger physicians resulted scarcely trained in risk management (p < 0.001). In conclusion, our findings suggest that defensive medicine is a common phenomenon among psychiatrists and their position of guarantee drives this attitude. Education on legal implications and risk management should be provided starting from the university and continuing over time, to improve the knowledge of young and senior doctors on professional liability and inform their decision-making processes. This would also reduce defensive practices and improve the quality of healthcare. Considering the concerns of younger physicians, as well as of professionals working in acute and high-intensity medical care facilities, there is also an urgent need for a revision of the medical liability to ensure the sustainability of the National Health Service.

Predictors of Defensive Practices among Italian Psychiatrists: Additional Findings from a National Survey

“…The high stress suffered by psychiatrists in their daily practice is also reflected in the feelings that have emerged among those who have been involved in a past civil or criminal complaint by one of their patients or their family members [14]. Anxiety, anger, and restlessness were common reactions, along with impaired functioning, while the least represented emotion, reported by less than one-fifth of the sample, was guilt.…”

“…The study used data from a cross-sectional survey involving 254 Italian psychiatrists performed between March and April 2023 to explore their attitudes and behaviors regarding DM and professional liability [14]. A link to an anonymous questionnaire, edited and distributed using the free online tool "Google Forms" (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA), was disseminated through the main means of communication in all the Italian national territory in order to obtain a homogeneous representation of professionals.…”

“…A recent medical liability reform, Law 24/2017, also known as 'Gelli-Bianco', has aimed to improve healthcare safety by emphasizing the reinforcement of risk management and adherence to clinical guidelines. Nevertheless, our recent survey indicates that the results are still not widely perceived as successful [14].…”

“…Among 254 physicians surveyed, nearly two-thirds admitted to practicing DM and expressed concerns about liability laws, perceiving that their duty of care compromised the healthcare goals [14]. Approximately one-fifth had been involved in a complaint, reporting symptoms such as anxiety, anger, restlessness, loss of energy, and functional impairment.…”

Management of antipsychotics in primary care: Insights from healthcare professionals and policy makers in the United Kingdom

“…Patients remain on APM due to HCP fear of censure if they stop them and a catastrophic event subsequently occurs (e.g., suicide or homicide committed by their patient). A recent study of Italian psychiatrists confirm 60% practice defensive medicine (making clinical decisions to lower risk of medicolegal liability, rather than for the benefit of the patient) and causes stress in practitioners [69,70]. Psychiatrists and GPs in the UK perceive they face 'multiple jeopardy' if their patient with mental illness dies by suicide or commits homicide, with censure possible from several bodies: (1) their employer; (2) the coroner; (3) civil malpractice claims; (4) criminal conviction; (5) the medical regulator (General Medical Council (GMC)).…”