2020
DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1853811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vowel variability and contrast in Childhood Apraxia of Speech: acoustics and articulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine whether increased rate leads to greater articulatory instability we compared the standard deviation of the tongue splines of the slowest rate productions to the fastest rate productions, by syllable, bi-syllable or trisyllable, using Bayes independent sample test between groups. Similar studies, for example, Lenoci et al (2020) and Zharkova and Hewlett (2009) also report standard deviations for token to token variability (though at normal speaking rate), but in both these studies the nearest-neighbour method is used, which is based on Euclidian distances within a Cartesian co-ordinate system. Again, we choose to use a polar co-ordinate system to avoid errors where the tongue is not parallel to the horizontal axis.…”
Section: Ultrasound Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether increased rate leads to greater articulatory instability we compared the standard deviation of the tongue splines of the slowest rate productions to the fastest rate productions, by syllable, bi-syllable or trisyllable, using Bayes independent sample test between groups. Similar studies, for example, Lenoci et al (2020) and Zharkova and Hewlett (2009) also report standard deviations for token to token variability (though at normal speaking rate), but in both these studies the nearest-neighbour method is used, which is based on Euclidian distances within a Cartesian co-ordinate system. Again, we choose to use a polar co-ordinate system to avoid errors where the tongue is not parallel to the horizontal axis.…”
Section: Ultrasound Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for example, Suppa et al [28] performed acoustical analysis of a sustained /e/ to detect Parkinson's disease in elderly patients; however, these utterances are more sensitive to dialects, and therefore, results may be less reliable. Instead, /a/, /I/, and /u/, usually referred to as cardinal or corner vowels, are characterized by a well-defined vocal tract configuration and remain stable during articulation, which makes them substantially independent of dialectal and even linguistic diversity [29].…”
Section: Vocal Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/ represent Italian cardinal vowels as they are characterized by well-defined vocal tract configurations which make their phonation quite stable regardless of dialectal inflections. 26 The recording of each sound was repeated three times for each subject at conversational tone and intensity in the following 7 different PPE configurations, for a total of 210 voice signals:…”
Section: A Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%