1990
DOI: 10.1121/1.2028073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vowel perception: Spectral shape versus formants

Abstract: Traditional theories of vowel perception favor formants over global spectral shape as the primary perceptual cues to vowel identity. In previous ASA meetings, results of speaker-independent automatic recognition experiments for vowels were reported that contrasted global spectral shape versus formants [A. J. Jagharghi and S. A. Zahorian, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 81, S18 (1987); S. A. Zahorian and A. J. Jagharghi, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 82, S37 (1987)]. These results indicate that automatic recognitio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, those results do not show whether vowel perception is more closely linked to overall spectral shape or spectral peaks. We have obtained some previous evidence to show that the perception of phonologically similar vowels, synthesized with conflicting cues to vowel identity in terms of spectral shape and formants, more closely follows spectral shape cues (Jagharghi, 1990;Jagharghi and Zahorian, 1990).…”
Section: E Comparison With Listening Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, those results do not show whether vowel perception is more closely linked to overall spectral shape or spectral peaks. We have obtained some previous evidence to show that the perception of phonologically similar vowels, synthesized with conflicting cues to vowel identity in terms of spectral shape and formants, more closely follows spectral shape cues (Jagharghi, 1990;Jagharghi and Zahorian, 1990).…”
Section: E Comparison With Listening Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%