2001
DOI: 10.1080/09668130120045870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voting in a Floating Party System: The 1999 Duma Election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
19
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the freedoms now granted to post-communist citizens, at least on paper, is that of not participating in the electoral process (Rose et al, 2001). Thus a fall in turnout from the figures close to 100% that were regularly seen before 1989 is not necessarily indicative of a collapse of support for democracy.…”
Section: 'Political Participation': Turnout Membership and Other Actmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the freedoms now granted to post-communist citizens, at least on paper, is that of not participating in the electoral process (Rose et al, 2001). Thus a fall in turnout from the figures close to 100% that were regularly seen before 1989 is not necessarily indicative of a collapse of support for democracy.…”
Section: 'Political Participation': Turnout Membership and Other Actmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the majority of parties lacked recognisable ideological platforms. Evidence of voting patterns showed little correlation between voters' party choices and socioeconomic indicators suggesting that parties were not mobilising support along social cleavage lines (Rose et al 2001). Unfortunately, this 'floating party system' undermined effective electoral accountability to Russian voters and the perpetuation of 'patronage-led political coalitions' (Rose et al 2001, p. 439).…”
Section: Governors and Duma Deputies In Russiamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…No party nominated candidates in all 225 single-member district elections, and only two parties, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (Kommunisticheskaya Partiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii) and Yabloko, nominated candidates in at least half of the districts. In the single-member district election, 42% of voters voted for independent candidates, with the result that over 50% of elected deputies were without partisan ties (Rose et al 2001). In addition, the majority of parties lacked recognisable ideological platforms.…”
Section: Governors and Duma Deputies In Russiamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…United Russia and the URF thus constituted the de facto legislative coalition supporting the Kremlin and its program in the early years of Putin's administration (Rose, Munro, and White 2001;Sakwa 2005). This connection to the regime likely yielded them the resources necessary to build organization at the local level, to recruit a superior slate of local candidates, and certainly to better familiarize voters with their candidates.…”
Section: The Russian Party System In 2003mentioning
confidence: 99%