Von vulnerablen Frauen zu einer  genderbewussten Klimapolitik

Röhr, Ulrike

doi:10.14512/oew330322

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…New knowledge must include integrating a wide spectrum of sex and gender-related aspects, and it needs to be placed into context. Such as in the case in UBA social science research on interdependent gender aspects of climate change and adaptation, in which the various climate relevant gender dimensions are spelled out and explained in six main categories (Röhr and Sauer 2018; Röhr, Alber, and Göldner 2018; Spitzner et al 2019). The gender dimensions are based on real life-experiences and structures faced by (many) women and men (on average) differently.…”

Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sex and gender approaches in environmental health research: two exemplary case studies of the German environment agency

Dębiak

Groth

Kolossa-Gehring

et al. 2019

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Engaging with the analytical categories of sex and gender in environmental health studies remains challenging in practice but promising with regards to research excellence and scientific benefit. The German Environment Agency reports on two case studies navigating this complex interaction in the fields of health risk assessment of environmental stressors and human biomonitoring studies. It is apparent that the levels of integration of the sex/gender theories and sex/gender data are differently advanced in research. In some areas the collection of sexdisaggregated data has just begun, whereas in others research started engaging with newer gender theories such as embodiment or intersectionality. The practical applications and obstacles in incorporating sex and gender dimensions into environmental health studies are presented and discussed.

show abstract

Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the methodological integration of intersectional aspects on gender and climate change and adaption, see i.e. Röhr, Alber, and Göldner (2018).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%