Using data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS), the purpose of this study is two-fold. First, the study is intended to identify coping strategies used by older adults. Second, the study is intended to examine the impact of chosen coping strategies on mortality reduction. The study focuses specifically on differences in religious and secular coping strategies used by older adults. The findings suggest that although coping strategies differ between those who selfclassify as religious and those who self-classify as non-religious, for both groups social approaches to coping (e.g., attending church and volunteering) were more likely than individual approaches (e.g., praying or active/passive coping) to reduce mortality. However, the most efficacious coping strategies, we conclude, are those matched to characteristics of the individual.
IntroductionStress processes are inherently intertwined with aging, and there are some stressors that are more common with increases in age than others. Indeed, given the different life transitions generally associated with older adulthood (e.g., retirement, death of a spouse/partner, role loss (Bossé, Aldwin, Levenson, & Workman-Daniels, 1991;Elwell & Maltbie-Crannell, 1981); loss of muscle mass and strength (Baumgartner, Stauber, McHugh, Koehler, & Garry, 1995); the onset of illness, physical impairments and disabilities, visual, auditory, and cognitive impairments (Thomas et al., 1983); loneliness and isolation (Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2007)), stress-inducing experiences often increase considerably in later life. And, stress, when improperly regulated has been shown to increase mortality risk particularly among older adults (e.g. Aldwin et al., 2011;Krause, 1998).Given the various life transitions that individuals tend to experience in older adulthood, it is no surprise that a number of scholars have sought to understand how older adults cope with stressful life situations especially within the context of their mental and physical health (e.g. Kraaij, Garnefski, & Maes, 2002;Moos, Brennan, Schutte, & Moos, 2006). Past research, for instance, has identified a plethora of coping strategies (for an overview and critique see Skinner, Edge, Altman, & Sherwood, 2003), with many scholars agreeing that coping is a multidimensional construct (Pearlin & Schooler, 1978;Skinner et al., 2003) which can either be religious (Koenig, Pargament, & Nielsen, 1998;Krause, 1998;Pargament, 1997) or secular in nature (Hampson, Glasgow, & Zeiss, 1996;Murberg, Furze, & Bru, 2004).Despite the different coping strategies that exist, to our knowledge, there has been only one study comparing the use of religious versus secular coping strategies among older adults (Dunn & Horgas, 2004). That study focused mainly on reporting the frequency of using religious and secular coping strategies, and did not analyze subsequent health outcomes of choosing either strategy. Our study, therefore, attempts to extend these findings by examining whether and to what extent the choice of religious or secular coping i...