2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1483-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volunteer monitoring of E. coli in streams of the upper Midwestern United States: a comparison of methods

Abstract: Fecal contamination of water is a public health concern for those using the water for drinking or recreation. The EPA recommends using Escherichia coli to evaluate recreational freshwaters for fecal contamination. With limited resources available, states have recently focused on training volunteers to expand data collection and resource assessment. Several bacteria testing methods are available for use by the public; however, few studies have comprehensively evaluated their use by volunteers. This study evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is always the question of accuracy of the participants' data. Numerous comparison studies of volunteer vs. professional water resources data suggest that volunteer data are generally comparable to professional data for chemical (Obrecht et al, 1998;Loperfido et al, 2010), physical (Rodrigues and Castro, 2008), and biological (Fore et al, 2001;Vail et al, 2003;Gowan et al, 2007;Stepenuck et al, 2011) monitoring. Notably, in all of these studies, volunteers were trained to carry out the monitoring in which they were engaged.…”
Section: Data Accuracymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There is always the question of accuracy of the participants' data. Numerous comparison studies of volunteer vs. professional water resources data suggest that volunteer data are generally comparable to professional data for chemical (Obrecht et al, 1998;Loperfido et al, 2010), physical (Rodrigues and Castro, 2008), and biological (Fore et al, 2001;Vail et al, 2003;Gowan et al, 2007;Stepenuck et al, 2011) monitoring. Notably, in all of these studies, volunteers were trained to carry out the monitoring in which they were engaged.…”
Section: Data Accuracymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Fecal coliform and Escherichia coli colony-forming units (CFU) were measured using Petrifilm™ (3 M, St. Paul, MN, USA). Petrifilm has been used elsewhere to provide estimates of fecal coliform and E. coli (Senini et al, 1997;Stepenuck et al, 2011). Volunteers wade to a depth of 0.5 m and collect surface water in a sterile whirl-pak (Nasco, Ft. Atksinson, WI, USA) while wearing nitrile gloves.…”
Section: Volunteer Litter Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspects of aquatic ecosystems that have been monitored by participants in these partnerships include invertebrate communities (Nerbonne and Nelson 2004), microbial indicator species (Stepenuck et al 2011), surface water hydrology (Turner and Richter 2011), and water clarity (Chipman et al 2004). The quality of environmental data collected by volunteers has been evaluated several times (e.g., Fore et al 2001, Nerbonne et al 2008, Latimore and Steen 2014.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%