This paper analyzes data from a population-based survey fielded in Sri Lanka, which showed that almost half of the women interested in using Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants were actually those who wanted to limit childbearing, a pattern also found in international Norplant clinical studies. A comparison between recently sterilized women and professed limiters of potential Norplant users showed the limiters to be socio-economically and demographically a significantly different group of women from those sterilized. Among several variables analyzed, the most important factor distinguishing the two groups was their relative economic status. Further comparison of the limiters with professed spacers interested in using Norplant showed that the spacers were yet another distinct category of women, the most important characteristic distinguishing between the two groups being the total number of living children. The preliminary results suggest that the Norplant implants system is not necessarily a substitute for sterilization; it appears potentially a popular method among those who want no more children but are not ready to accept sterilization. These findings that the potential Norplant implant users represent different gradients of women in the population have implications for provider counseling and user satisfaction as well as continuation.