2000
DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.206084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voluntary Siting and Equity: The MRS Facility Experience in Native America

Abstract: This article focuses on aspects of intragenerational and intergenerational equity in the context of a unique policy experiment: the effort of the U.S. government to site a monitored, retrievable storage (MRS) facility for high-level civilian nuclear waste. This process and its outcomes are examined from both normative and subjective perspectives. While the MRS siting process was designed to be equitable, its eventual focus on Native American communities raises profound questions about environmental justice, as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, energy, resource, and military development on tribal lands are perhaps three of the most extensively recorded and studied Native American EJ challenges (e.g. Burger, Powers, and Gochfeld 2010; Gowda and Easterling 2000). …”
Section: Strategies In Native American Environmental Justice Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, energy, resource, and military development on tribal lands are perhaps three of the most extensively recorded and studied Native American EJ challenges (e.g. Burger, Powers, and Gochfeld 2010; Gowda and Easterling 2000). …”
Section: Strategies In Native American Environmental Justice Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 7,8 ) Differences in risk perception have been studied along lines of gender, race and ethnicity, nationality, and socioeconomic status, with risk areas ranging from environmental health to finance to automobile accidents. ( 9–14 )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the risks involved transportation issues, food issues, energy issues, including nuclear, or cutting‐edge scientific developments such as nanotechnologies . Chemical risks and industrial risks connected with contaminated soil formed a large part of the sample . Apart from technological and industrial risks, the authors were interested in natural risks, sometimes in the “Act of God” category.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%