2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2950-09.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voluntary Nicotine Consumption TriggersIn VivoPotentiation of Cortical Excitatory Drives to Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons

Abstract: Active response to either natural or pharmacological reward causes synaptic modifications to excitatory synapses on dopamine (DA) neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Here, we examine these modifications using nicotine, the main addictive component of tobacco, which is a potent regulator of VTA DA neurons. Using an in vivo electrophysiological technique, we investigated the role of key components of the limbic circuit, the infralimbic cortex (ILCx) and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPAR a receptors can exert tonic inhibition of DA cell activity, as their antagonism increases the spontaneous firing rate of VTA DA neurons (Melis et al, 2010). Accordingly, deficient OEA tone may contribute to enhanced spontaneous firing and burst activity of VTA DA cells that is more pronounced following a history of nicotine SA vs YA (Caille et al, 2009). The PPAR a influence on VTA DA cell activity likely occurs through a negative modulation of a 4 b 2 -nACh receptor expression or function (Melis et al, 2010), and it is conceivable that reduced PPAR a activation resulting from deficient OEA tone contributes to enhanced VTA a 4 b 2 -nACh receptor expression that is more pronounced following nicotine SA vs YA (Metaxas et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PPAR a receptors can exert tonic inhibition of DA cell activity, as their antagonism increases the spontaneous firing rate of VTA DA neurons (Melis et al, 2010). Accordingly, deficient OEA tone may contribute to enhanced spontaneous firing and burst activity of VTA DA cells that is more pronounced following a history of nicotine SA vs YA (Caille et al, 2009). The PPAR a influence on VTA DA cell activity likely occurs through a negative modulation of a 4 b 2 -nACh receptor expression or function (Melis et al, 2010), and it is conceivable that reduced PPAR a activation resulting from deficient OEA tone contributes to enhanced VTA a 4 b 2 -nACh receptor expression that is more pronounced following nicotine SA vs YA (Metaxas et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volitional nature of nicotine exposure may also influence the neurochemical stimuli that provoke AEA production. For example, nicotine SA and YA produce distinct alterations in nAChR expression, DA D 2 receptor binding, and corticosterone levels (Caille et al, 2009;Donny et al, 2000;Metaxas et al, 2010), and each of these systems can influence the production of AEA and related ethanolamides (Centonze et al, 2004;Di et al, 2003Di et al, , 2005Giuffrida et al, 1999;Hill et al, 2010a, b;Stella and Piomelli, 2001). …”
Section: Endocannabinoid Levels Following Nicotine Exposure Mw Buczynmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neuroadaptations that are caused by repeated passive exposure to the drug itself have been widely studied (Nestler, 1992;Lüscher and Malenka, 2011), but there are further changes in brain function that reflect the memory of drug experience. These further brain changes are seen in animals that self-administer the drug, but are absent in animals that have passively received 'yoked' injections of the same drug at the same dose and temporal pattern (Wang et al, 2005;You et al, 2007You et al, , 2008Chen et al, 2008;Caillé et al, 2009). Here, we were concerned with brain changes involved in the consolidation of the memory for drug-environment association established by Pavlovian conditioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronic and voluntary intake of drugs of abuse in animals has different neurological consequences than passive intake of the same substances or intake of natural rewards, such as sucrose (Dumont et al, 2005;Martin et al, 2006;Chen et al, 2008;You et al, 2008;Caillé et al, 2009;Kalant, 2010). For example, rats with a history of cocaine or nicotine self-administration demonstrate enhanced (in magnitude or duration) AMPA-mediated responses in several areas of the brain reward system, but these changes are not seen in rats self-administering a natural reward or when drug intake is passive (Dumont et al, 2005;Martin et al, 2006;Chen et al, 2008;You et al, 2008;Caillé et al, 2009;Kalant, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%