2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric White Matter Hyperintensity Ranges Correspond to Fazekas Scores on Brain MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of bi-hemispheric infarctions ( p = 0.001), presence ( p = 0.006), size ( p = 0.016) and number ( p = 0.005) of cerebral-microbleed (CMB) were higher risk of PRES. There was no significant association between the presence or severity of white matter hyperintensities [as measured by Fazekas score ( 13 )] and the risk of PRES.…”
Section: Results and Summarymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The presence of bi-hemispheric infarctions ( p = 0.001), presence ( p = 0.006), size ( p = 0.016) and number ( p = 0.005) of cerebral-microbleed (CMB) were higher risk of PRES. There was no significant association between the presence or severity of white matter hyperintensities [as measured by Fazekas score ( 13 )] and the risk of PRES.…”
Section: Results and Summarymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Over decades, measurements of white matter lesions have evolved from visual rating methods to semi-automated volumetry to tractography. Some evidence suggests high reliability and more efficacy of semi-automatic volume measurement than visual rating methods ( 45 , 46 ). We used visual rating scale in this study, CHIPS in particular, which was validated by high correlation to the volumetric analysis of the cholinergic pathways ( 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe WMH were defined as a volume of 16.1 milliliter or more, corresponding to a Fazekas score of 3. 25,26 All scans were appraised by trained research physicians for the presence of cerebral microbleeds (i.e., small round to ovoid hypointense areas on T2*-weighted images), lacunes (i.e., focal cavitating lesions ≥3 and <15 mm), and cortical infarcts. 27 These ratings were done blinded to clinical data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%