Volumetric Resection Using the SurgiScope&lt;sup&gt;®&lt;/sup&gt;: A Quantitative Accuracy Analysis of Robot-Assisted Resection

Amin, Devin V.; Lunsford, L. Dade

doi:10.1159/000083177

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Size and shape Anthropomorphic phantoms: Landi et al, 2001;Liu et al, 2001;Li et al, 2002;Amin and Lunsford, 2004;Henderson, 2004;Henderson et al, 2004;Labadie et al, 2005;Pappas et al, 2005;Quiñones-Hinojosa et al, 2006;Rosenow and Sootsman, 2006;Shamir et al, 2006;Varma and Eldridge, 2006;Eggers and Muhling, 2007;Eljamel, 2007;Rachinger et al, 2007;Widmann et al, 2008;Xia et al, 2008;Balachandran et al, 2009;Arata et al, 2011;Brodie and Eljamel, 2011;Joskowicz et al, 2011;Comparetti et al, 2012;Heinig et al, 2012;Larson et al, 2012;Lefranc et al, 2014;Kajita et al, 2015;Ballesteros-Zebadúa et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2016;Niccolini et al, 2016;Cardinale et al, 2017;Cutolo et al, 2017;Zeng et al, 2017 Non-anthropomorphic phantoms: Moriarty et al, 2000;Reinges et al, 2000;Steinmeier et al, 2000;Benardete et al, 2001;Willems et al, 2001;Morgan et al, 2003;Poggi et al, 2003;Krempien et al, 2004;Bale et al, 2006;…”

Section: Phantom Design Features Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cosman-Robert-Wells frame: Quiñones-Hinojosa et al, 2006;Eljamel, 2007;Heinig et al, 2011Heinig et al, , 2012; Zamorano-Dujovny frame: Lefranc et al, 2014;Nakazawa et al, 2014;Kajita et al, 2015 Compatibility with standard localization and registration methods Fitzpatrick, 2010;Markelj et al, 2012;Lefranc et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2014;Šuligoj et al, 2018a,b (Continued) Reinges et al, 2000;Steinmeier et al, 2000;Landi et al, 2001;Liu et al, 2001;Willems et al, 2001;Li et al, 2002;Morgan et al, 2003;Poggi et al, 2003;Henderson et al, 2004; Metal rulers: Amin and Lunsford, 2004;Henderson, 2004;Labadie et al, 2005;Quiñones-Hinojosa et al, 2006;Rosenow and Sootsman, 2006;Shamir et al, 2006;Varma and Eldridge, 2006; Depth gauges: Bale et al, 2006;Liu et al, 2006;Eggers and Muhling, 2007;Eljamel, 2007;Rachinger et al, 2007;Rawlings and Crawford, 2008;Xia et al, 2008;Chan et al, 2009;Labadie et al, 2009;Ringel et al, 2009;Giese et al, 2010;Joskowicz et al, 2011; CMM:…”

Section: Phantom Design Features Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stereotactic Neuro-Navigation Phantom Designs: A Systematic Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diverse stereotactic neuro-navigation systems are used daily in neurosurgery and novel systems are continuously being developed. Prior to clinical implementation of new surgical tools, methods or instruments, in vitro experiments on phantoms should be conducted. A stereotactic neuro-navigation phantom denotes a rigid or deformable structure resembling the cranium with the intracranial area. The use of phantoms is essential for the testing of complete procedures and their workflows, as well as for the final validation of the application accuracy. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of stereotactic neuro-navigation phantom designs, to identify their most relevant features, and to identify methodologies for measuring the target point error, the entry point error, and the angular error (α). The literature on phantom designs used for evaluating the accuracy of stereotactic neuro-navigation systems, i.e., robotic navigation systems, stereotactic frames, frameless navigation systems, and aiming devices, was searched. Eligible articles among the articles written in English in the period 2000-2020 were identified through the electronic databases PubMed, IEEE, Web of Science, and Scopus. The majority of phantom designs presented in those articles provide a suitable methodology for measuring the target point error, while there is a lack of objective measurements of the entry point error and angular error. We identified the need for a universal phantom design, which would be compatible with most common imaging techniques (e.g., computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) and suitable for simultaneous measurement of the target point, entry point, and angular errors.

show abstract

Section: Phantom Design Features Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Phantom Design Features Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stereotactic Neuro-Navigation Phantom Designs: A Systematic Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The robots have been simple needle drivers, such as the PAKY, Fenster, and Philips systems [7,11,12], numerically controlled milling machines, such as the Robodoc and CRIGOS [13,14], or fully capable of surgery, such as the Neuromate, Zeus, or daVinci [10,15,16]. In addition the analysis of the performance of the robots can go from pegboards, to phantoms [12,[16][17][18][19], to animals [11], and then surgical outcomes [13,20].…”

Section: Robotics In Medicinementioning

confidence: 99%

Toward image-guided robotic surgery: determining intrinsic accuracy of the da Vinci robot

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of robotics in medicine has been growing in recent years. The introduction of specialized robots for surgery such as the daVinci (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has largely motivated this growth. The currently available robotic-assisted surgery systems rely only on direct vision through the use of a laparoscopic camera for surgical guidance. While these cameras provide a stereoscopic view of the surface, they are incapable of showing beneath the surgical surface. In other surgical developments, image guidance has become an integral part of navigation and planning, allowing understanding of the locations beneath the surgical plane. As an early step in the development of a robotic image-guided surgical (RIGS) system, the physical limitations of a surgical robot must be assessed. In this paper the accuracy and the precision of the daVinci surgical system are quantified. It is shown that the daVinci system can successfully localize a point with an approximate fiducial localization error (FLE) of 1 mm. This FLE value demonstrates that the daVinci is within the accuracy limits of the other commonly used surgical localizers.

show abstract

“…SurgiScope is particularly useful in intracranial operations, when the procedure requires navigation between sensitive neural elements, visible through a restricted access [24]. Additionally, its neuronavigation function facilitates resections or targeting procedures, when the boundaries of the surgical target volume are not visually distinct [26].…”

Section: State-of-the-art Robotic Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Robotic Technology for Stereotactic Neurosurgery

Faria

Erlhagen

Rito

et al. 2015

IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research of stereotactic apparatus to guide surgical devices began in 1908, yet a major part of today's stereotactic neurosurgeries still rely on stereotactic frames developed almost half a century ago. Robots excel at handling spatial information, and are, thus, obvious candidates in the guidance of instrumentation along precisely planned trajectories. In this review, we introduce the concept of stereotaxy and describe a standard stereotactic neurosurgery. Neurosurgeons' expectations and demands regarding the role of robots as assistive tools are also addressed. We list the most successful robotic systems developed specifically for or capable of executing stereotactic neurosurgery. A critical review is presented for each robotic system, emphasizing the differences between them and detailing positive features and drawbacks. An analysis of the listed robotic system features is also undertaken, in the context of robotic application in stereotactic neurosurgery. Finally, we discuss the current perspective, and future directions of a robotic technology in this field. All robotic systems follow a very similar and structured workflow despite the technical differences that set them apart. No system unequivocally stands out as an absolute best. The trend of technological progress is pointing toward the development of miniaturized cost-effective solutions with more intuitive interfaces.

show abstract

Volumetric Resection Using the SurgiScope<sup>®</sup>: A Quantitative Accuracy Analysis of Robot-Assisted Resection

Cited by 8 publications

References 13 publications

Stereotactic Neuro-Navigation Phantom Designs: A Systematic Review

Stereotactic Neuro-Navigation Phantom Designs: A Systematic Review

Toward image-guided robotic surgery: determining intrinsic accuracy of the da Vinci robot

Review of Robotic Technology for Stereotactic Neurosurgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About