2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric effects of motor cortex injury on recovery of ipsilesional dexterous movements

Abstract: Damage to the motor cortex of one hemisphere has classically been associated with contralateral upper limb paresis, but recent patient studies have identified deficits in both upper limbs. In non-human primates, we tested the hypothesis that the severity of ipsilesional upper limb motor impairment in the early post-injury phase depends on the volume of gray and white matter damage of the motor areas of the frontal lobe. We also postulated that substantial recovery would accompany minimal task practice and that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is abundantly clear from the present findings, including our previous work and classical work that the non-human primate brain is capable of considerable recovery of function after lesions that damage a substantial portion of the arm/hand areas of M1, LPMC and other frontal lobe areas (Darling et al 2009; Darling et al 2011a). This has important implications for rehabilitation therapies as nearly exclusive forced-use of the impaired hand for an extended period of time, as in constraint induced movement therapy (Taub et al 1993; Wolf et al 2006), may not be required to enhance recovery of hand function after lesions limited to lateral frontal lobe motor areas that spare a portion of M1c.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is abundantly clear from the present findings, including our previous work and classical work that the non-human primate brain is capable of considerable recovery of function after lesions that damage a substantial portion of the arm/hand areas of M1, LPMC and other frontal lobe areas (Darling et al 2009; Darling et al 2011a). This has important implications for rehabilitation therapies as nearly exclusive forced-use of the impaired hand for an extended period of time, as in constraint induced movement therapy (Taub et al 1993; Wolf et al 2006), may not be required to enhance recovery of hand function after lesions limited to lateral frontal lobe motor areas that spare a portion of M1c.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…After detailed microscopic analysis, the cortical and subcortical limits of each lesion site were plotted onto anatomically homologous Nissl stained tissue sections from the non-lesioned hemisphere (see Figs. 1 and 3 of Darling et al 2011) using the microscope and an attached MAC 5000 motorized stage (Ludl Electronic Products, Hawthore, NY) which was connected to Neurolucida data collection software system (MBF Bioscience, Williston, Vermont, USA). Gray matter and white matter lesion site volumes were then calculated using Neurolucida software as previously described (Pizzimenti et al, 2007; Darling et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5B and 6B; percentages above 100% in Table 1 for the left hand in Ac-P1, Rec-P1 and Pl-P1 periods; see also Darling et al, 2011a;Manganotti et al, 2008;Kaeser et al, 2010). Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, the unaffected hemisphere has been reported to be disinhibited during the early period following a unilateral stroke, as suggested by the loss of the interhemispheric connection originating from the lesioned hemisphere (Shimizu et al, 2002).…”
Section: Role Of the Intact M1 In The Spontaneous Functional Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After detailed microscopic analysis, the cortical and subcortical limits of each lesion site were plotted onto anatomically homologous Nissl-stained tissue sections from the non-lesioned hemisphere (see Figs. 1 and 3 of Darling et al 2011) using the microscope and an attached MAC 5000 motorized stage (Ludl Electronic Products, Hawthore, NY, USA) which was attached to Neurolucida data collection software (MBF Bioscience, Williston, VT, USA). Gray matter and white matter lesion site volumes were then calculated using Neurolucida software as previously described (Pizzimenti et al 2007; Darling et al 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%