2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0473-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone structure, and structural geometry among rural South Indian, US Caucasian, and Afro-Caribbean older men

Abstract: SummaryPeripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) provides biomechanical estimates of bone strength. Rural South Indian men have reduced biomechanical indices of bone strength compared to US Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean men. This suggests an underlying higher risk of osteoporotic fractures and greater future fracture burden among the rural South Indian men.IntroductionGeographical and racial comparisons of bone mineral density (BMD) have largely focused on DXA measures of areal BMD. In contrast, periph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a cross-cohort comparison between rural South Indian, the US Caucasian (MrOS) and Afro Caribbean (Tobago Cohort) men aged 60 and above, similar patterns were observed. Compared to the US-Caucasians, rural Indian men had lower bone strength, trabecular vBMD and cortical thickness, whereas Afro-Caribbeans’ had similar trabecular vBMD, higher cortical vBMD and greater strength [ 25 •], similar to the reported UK differences [ 24 ]. More studies are required to understand how bone geometry translates to fracture risk in men.…”
Section: Ethnic Differences In Bone Microarchitecturementioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a cross-cohort comparison between rural South Indian, the US Caucasian (MrOS) and Afro Caribbean (Tobago Cohort) men aged 60 and above, similar patterns were observed. Compared to the US-Caucasians, rural Indian men had lower bone strength, trabecular vBMD and cortical thickness, whereas Afro-Caribbeans’ had similar trabecular vBMD, higher cortical vBMD and greater strength [ 25 •], similar to the reported UK differences [ 24 ]. More studies are required to understand how bone geometry translates to fracture risk in men.…”
Section: Ethnic Differences In Bone Microarchitecturementioning
confidence: 77%
“…number* White American < Chinese-American and White American < Hong Kong Chinese (post-menopausal) Tb. separation* Chinese > Caucasian (pre-menopausal) Ct./total cross-sectional area, matrix mineral density* Matrix mineral density* [ 23 ] Caucasian > Chinese (pre-menopausal) Total cross-sectional area, Ct. area, medullary cross-sectional area, Ct. porosity (total*, compact-appearing*, outer transitional zone) Total cross-sectional area, Ct. area*, Medullary cross-sectional area*, Ct. porosity (total*, compact-appearing*, outer transitional zone*) Chinese > Caucasian (post-menopausal) Ct. porosity (inner transitional zone*) Ct. porosity (inner transitional zone*) Caucasian > Chinese (post-menopausal) Total cross-sectional area, Ct. area*, medullary cross-sectional area*, Ct. thickness*, Whole bone stiffness*, Failure load* Total cross-sectional area, Whole bone stiffness, Failure load pQCT in men Black Afro-Caribbean > White European and South Asian, White European > South Asian Ct. thickness*, Ct. area* (diaphysis) Ct. area*, Ct. thickness, Cross-sectional area, CSMI (diaphysis) [ 24 ] Rural South Indian < US Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean > US Caucasian Ct. thickness (diaphysis)** SSI (metaphysis)** [ 25 •] Rural South Indian<US Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean < US Caucasian Ct. thickness (diaphysis)** Rural South Indian>US Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean > US Caucasian Endosteal circumference (diaphysis)** HR-pQCT in young adults Caucasian > Asian men Total bone area*, Tb. area*, Tb.…”
Section: Ethnic Differences In Bone Microarchitecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the lower success rate in our study may be attributed to lower cortical bone mineral density in Indians. 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%