1996
DOI: 10.1210/jc.81.4.1586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric bone mineral density in normal subjects, aged 5-27 years

Abstract: Concerns have been raised regarding the validity of using areal bone mineral density (aBMD) as a substitute for the true volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in the pediatric population. We studied 209 normal subjects (109 males), aged 5-27 yr, to examine the influence of age, gender and growth on vBMD. The femoral neck, midthird of the femoral shaft, and the four lumbar vertebral bodies (L1-L4) were studied. Using data on bone width and height obtained by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, bone volume was ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
81
1
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
81
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Volume increases more rapidly than surface during growth and the areal BMD measured by DXA increases even without change in the true BMD. The results of volumetric BMD measured using current DXA technology, which are similar to those using QCT, seem to corroborate this hypothesis [25]. Our results seem to be consistent with the results obtained from different techniques of BMD measurement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Volume increases more rapidly than surface during growth and the areal BMD measured by DXA increases even without change in the true BMD. The results of volumetric BMD measured using current DXA technology, which are similar to those using QCT, seem to corroborate this hypothesis [25]. Our results seem to be consistent with the results obtained from different techniques of BMD measurement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, because of technological limitations, DXA calculates a two-dimensional bone projected area, and the output is expressed as an areal density (BMDarea). In order to correct the values of lumbar or femoral BMD for the ‘apparent’ bone sizes, some mathematical models have been proposed that assume the ROI of the vertebral body to have the shape of a cube [24, 25]or a cylinder with a circular [26, 27, 28]or elliptic base area [29], and the ROI of the femoral neck or midshaft to have the shape of a cylinder [2, 27]. Then, vBMD is calculated on the basis of the estimated bone volume instead of bone surface area.…”
Section: Bone Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) [18,19,20,21,22]. The strongest predictors of bone mass development are height and muscle mass (fig.…”
Section: What Are the Predictors Of Bone Development?mentioning
confidence: 99%