2016
DOI: 10.1590/1807-2577.05816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric and cephalometric evaluation of the upper airway of class III patients submitted to maxillary advancement

Abstract: ResumoIntrodução: A deficiência anteroposterior da maxila pode estar associada com a diminuição do volume da via aérea superior. O avanço de maxila por resultar em um aumento do espaço aéreo superior. Objetivo: Correlacionar mensurações cefalométricas (2D) e volumétricas (3D) da via aérea superior em pacientes classe III tratados por meio de avanço maxilar. Material e método: Este estudo retrospectivo transversal foi realizado em dez pacientes adultos submetidos ao avanço de maxila para correção de deficiência… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors argue that these results are associated with the small maxillary advancement necessary to correct the maxillary deformity in the evaluated patients. 32 In the present study, it was not possible to quantify the surgical movements performed during OS, limiting this type of analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the authors argue that these results are associated with the small maxillary advancement necessary to correct the maxillary deformity in the evaluated patients. 32 In the present study, it was not possible to quantify the surgical movements performed during OS, limiting this type of analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, it must be considered that the pre and post-mean values indicated an unobstructed nasopharynx, with means greater than 0.790 cm 2 . 26 Likewise, Santiago et al (2016) 32 through cephalometric and volumetric analysis did not find statistically significant differences in the nasopharynx after OS. However, the authors argue that these results are associated with the small maxillary advancement necessary to correct the maxillary deformity in the evaluated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%