2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jics.2022.100370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric and acoustic studies of aqueous l-arginine·HCl and l-proline in electrolytic and non-electrolytic solutions at various temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ascertain the reliability of the experimental setup and obtain ρ and u data, measurements of aqueous l -proline and l -valine solutions were undertaken, and a comparative analysis was conducted with the available literature. As depicted in Figures S1–S4 (Supporting Information), the obtained experimental data are in excellent agreement with the values reported earlier by the other authors. The precision of the measurements, as specified by the manufacturer, is 0.01 m·s –1 for speed of sound measurements and 0.001 kg·m –3 for density measurements. However, to consider the discrepancies resulting from systematic errors, the standard uncertainties were estimated using 10 consecutive measurements of a single solute concentration across all of the reported temperatures, i.e., ( T = 288.15–318.15) K. The standard deviation (σ) was determined from the resulting experimental data employing expression σ = { ( F false( x exp false) F false( x normala normalv normale normalr normala normalg normale false) ) 2 ( n 1 ) } 1 / 2 where n denotes the number of experimental points.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To ascertain the reliability of the experimental setup and obtain ρ and u data, measurements of aqueous l -proline and l -valine solutions were undertaken, and a comparative analysis was conducted with the available literature. As depicted in Figures S1–S4 (Supporting Information), the obtained experimental data are in excellent agreement with the values reported earlier by the other authors. The precision of the measurements, as specified by the manufacturer, is 0.01 m·s –1 for speed of sound measurements and 0.001 kg·m –3 for density measurements. However, to consider the discrepancies resulting from systematic errors, the standard uncertainties were estimated using 10 consecutive measurements of a single solute concentration across all of the reported temperatures, i.e., ( T = 288.15–318.15) K. The standard deviation (σ) was determined from the resulting experimental data employing expression σ = { ( F false( x exp false) F false( x normala normalv normale normalr normala normalg normale false) ) 2 ( n 1 ) } 1 / 2 where n denotes the number of experimental points.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%