2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumes, spatial extents and a probabilistic atlas of the human basal ganglia and thalamus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
81
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar probabilistic anatomical maps have been generated for subcortical structures. 1 Neuroanatomical studies have identified multiple factors that affect anatomical variability, including but not limited to sex, handedness, aging, and neurological and psychiatric diseases such as depression, psychosis, and dementia. 2,3,30,33,56,57 In the neurosurgical population, additional interpatient anatomical variability arises from the presence of intracranial pathology.…”
Section: Anatomical Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar probabilistic anatomical maps have been generated for subcortical structures. 1 Neuroanatomical studies have identified multiple factors that affect anatomical variability, including but not limited to sex, handedness, aging, and neurological and psychiatric diseases such as depression, psychosis, and dementia. 2,3,30,33,56,57 In the neurosurgical population, additional interpatient anatomical variability arises from the presence of intracranial pathology.…”
Section: Anatomical Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Yet, optimal precise target localization remains controversial. Assessment of localizations on postoperative structural MR imaging data in their specific anatomic context requires spatial normalization to transform individual anatomic variability [4][5][6] by geometric alignment of corresponding structures across patients (patient-to-patient) or to a standard (patient-to-atlas). Commonly, the position of the electrode is indirectly reported in coordinates along the 3 axes relative to the midcommissural point (MCP) between the anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC) 1,[6][7][8][9][10][11] and is normalized by the individual distance from the AC to the PC in relation to a standard atlas ACPC distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,23 However, manual assessment of the nuclear outlines is prone to limited inter-rater reliability. 5 Another approach 24 is based on the manual definition of reliably identifiable landmarks to transform MR imaging data into the stereotactic Atlas of the Human Brain. 25 Nevertheless, an automatic approach would reduce the effort necessary on the part of the expert and avoid inaccuracies that can arise from manual assessment of anatomic landmarks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations