2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume versus surface-based cortical thickness measurements: A comparative study with healthy controls and multiple sclerosis patients

Abstract: The cerebral cortex is a highly folded outer layer of grey matter tissue that plays a key role in cognitive functions. In part, alterations of the cortex during development and disease can be captured by measuring the cortical thickness across the whole brain. Available software tools differ with regard to labor intensity and computational demands. In this study, we compared the computational anatomy toolbox (CAT), a recently proposed volume-based tool, with the well-established surface-based tool FreeSurfer. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, one recently published study did not find CAT12 overestimations, in contrast to our results. Moreover, their results suggest that CAT12 CT estimations were lower compared to FreeSurfer with respect to several brain regions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, one recently published study did not find CAT12 overestimations, in contrast to our results. Moreover, their results suggest that CAT12 CT estimations were lower compared to FreeSurfer with respect to several brain regions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 2, differences in scanner manufacturer and platform (Siemens, Philips, and GE), eld strength (3.0 T and 1.5 T), head coil (8-, 12-, 32-, and 64-channel), MR sequence (MPRAGE, FFE, TFE, FLASH, and FSPGR), TR/TE, and voxel size (from 1.33 × 1.0 × 1.0 to 0.89 × 0.89 × 0.8 mm 3 ) across studies were noted. Besides, variations in computing workstation types [65], operating systems [65,66], processing pipelines and software packages [65,67,68], the extent of smoothing [69], and statistical strategies [10,16,17,22] may produce inconsistent results. These differences make direct comparisons between the different studies di cult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we used CAT12 to render and analyze surface-based cortical thickness maps [30]. We recently validated this technique in MS patients [31]. For smoothing of surface images, we used a Gaussian Kernel of 8 mm.…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%