2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00924-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume regression of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation to successful endoluminal exclusion

Abstract: Volumetric analysis may be used to predict successful endoluminal exclusion of AAAs. Volume regression appears to be device-independent and should be expected in most clinically successful cases. The presence of volume increases in the first 6 months is suspicious for an endoleak that is pressurizing the aneurysm sac and heralds the need for closer evaluation and possible intervention. A volume decrease of 10% or greater at 6 months and continuing regression over time is associated with successful endovascular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
46
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, several potentially important variables, including inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar artery diameter (28), and neck calcification were not included in the analyses. Another limitation is that AAA volume may be a more accurate predictor than diameter for sac expansion or regression after EVAR and may have been more appropriate as an objective standard (29). However, it is very difficult and labor-intensive to analyze thin-slice CT images obtained at each follow-up using a dedicated three-dimensional workstation to provide reliable results, and to measure the sac volume at each follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several potentially important variables, including inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar artery diameter (28), and neck calcification were not included in the analyses. Another limitation is that AAA volume may be a more accurate predictor than diameter for sac expansion or regression after EVAR and may have been more appropriate as an objective standard (29). However, it is very difficult and labor-intensive to analyze thin-slice CT images obtained at each follow-up using a dedicated three-dimensional workstation to provide reliable results, and to measure the sac volume at each follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensional evolution of the aneurysmal sac is the primary prognostic factor in these patients: a stable or shrinking aneurysm is associated with a low risk of rupture, even if associated with a small type II endoleak. On the contrary, an increasing sac is associated with a higher risk of rupture, and treatment is mandatory [14][15][16][17][18][19]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondo i principali protocolli di sorveglianza, il follow-up dei pazienti sottoposti ad EVAR prevede un esame angio-TC a 1-3 mesi dal posizionamento dell'endoprotesi e successivamente, in assenza di complicanze, con scadenza annuale [8,[10][11][12][13]. Dopo EVAR, gli aneurismi che rimangono stabili o diminuiscono di dimensioni presentano un ridotto rischio di rottura e non richiedono ulteriori interventi anche in presenza di piccoli endoleaks [14][15][16][17][18][19]. L'analisi volumetrica della sacca è una misura più accurata della variazioni dimensionali dell'aneurisma rispetto alle misure lineari comunemente utilizzate [14,15,[20][21][22].…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In consideration of aortic kinking and irregular aneurysm morphology, diameter should be measured on multi-planar images. Three-dimensional reconstruc- tions and volumetric measurements are helpful in certain patients who do not show aneurysm regression [35,36].…”
Section: Diameter Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%