2008
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.118737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume-outcome relation for contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in daily clinical practice: is it limited to high-risk patients? Results from the Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK)

Abstract: This analysis of contemporary PCI in clinical practice shows a small but significant volume-outcome relation for in-hospital mortality. However, this relation was only apparent in high-risk subgroups, such as patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Barker et al compiled national inpatient data that suggest that among patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection, those who were admitted to high-volume centers had lower mortality rates, better hospital discharge disposition, and fewer complications (15). This direct association between provider volume and improved patient outcome is consistent with the reports from multiple surgical subspecialties, such as surgical oncology (20,24,25), cardiovascular surgery (19,21,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), abdominal surgery (31-37), urology (38), and ophthalmology (39). Recent reports in general surgery have indicated that referral to high-volume hospitals is dependent on racial and socioeconomic factors, with non-whites having a reduced likelihood of being admitted to high-volume institutions (40).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Barker et al compiled national inpatient data that suggest that among patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection, those who were admitted to high-volume centers had lower mortality rates, better hospital discharge disposition, and fewer complications (15). This direct association between provider volume and improved patient outcome is consistent with the reports from multiple surgical subspecialties, such as surgical oncology (20,24,25), cardiovascular surgery (19,21,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), abdominal surgery (31-37), urology (38), and ophthalmology (39). Recent reports in general surgery have indicated that referral to high-volume hospitals is dependent on racial and socioeconomic factors, with non-whites having a reduced likelihood of being admitted to high-volume institutions (40).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The relationship of these outcomes and operator or institutional volume has not been shown earlier. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]35 Our study demonstrates a statistically significant inverse association between operator volume and outcome (in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications) in the current practice. Our results are in agreement with results from previous studies done both in the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and the stent era.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Our results are in agreement with results from previous studies done both in the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and the stent era. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]35,36 Previous studies have been limited by the number of centers, 12,20 state-based registry data, 8,14,15,18 inclusion of only limited cohorts, 16 lower sample size, 8,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]20 foreign studies, 11,19,21 and most importantly they lack data from recent era. 6,7,9,16 Previous studies, which have shown a decrease in mortality with increasing operator volume, have failed to reach statistical significance because of low sample size, large confidence interval, or low procedure related mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, crude 30-day mortality rate was 1.1% (Table 2). Zahn et al (24) reported an in-hospital mortality of 1.85% in hospitals belonging to the lowest PCI volume quartile and 1.21% in the highest quartile. But technological improvement of PCI, PCI instruments and new pharmacologic therapies in recent years it might have reduced mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%