Adaptive learning systems need to meet two complementary and partially conflicting goals: detecting regularities in the world versus remembering specific events. The hippocampus (HC) keeps a fine balance between computations that extract commonalities of incoming information (i.e., pattern completion) and computations that enable encoding of highly similar events into unique representations (i.e., pattern separation). Histological evidence from young rhesus monkeys suggests that HC development is characterized by the differential development of intrahippocampal subfields and associated networks. However, due to challenges in the in vivo investigation of such developmental organization, the ontogenetic timing of HC subfield maturation remains controversial. Delineating its course is important, as it directly influences the fine balance between pattern separation and pattern completion operations and, thus, developmental changes in learning and memory. Here, we relate in vivo, high-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging data of HC subfields to behavioral memory performance in children aged 6-14 y and in young adults. We identify a multivariate profile of age-related differences in intrahippocampal structures and show that HC maturity as captured by this pattern is associated with age differences in the differential encoding of unique memory representations.hippocampal subfields | episodic memory | specificity | pattern separation | child development M any years ago, the Swiss developmentalist Jean Piaget noted an imbalance between assimilation and accommodation during early and middle childhood in the sense that children tend to extract schematic knowledge at the expense of learning and recollecting specific events (1, 2). This imbalance has resurfaced in computational models of memory (3), and later as the imbalance between pattern completion and pattern separation, processes linked to computational properties of subfields within the hippocampus (HC) (4-6). Understanding the developmental organization of HC subfields is therefore crucial to understand how associated changes in HC-subfield computations drive concomitant changes in learning and memory.An important step toward unraveling controversies about human hippocampal maturation (7,8) is to acknowledge that the HC is not a homogeneous structure, but rather is composed of cytoarchitectonically and functionally distinct subfields (9). The availability of high-resolution, in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the HC permits the study of specific contributions of different HC subfields in humans (10-12). Computational and rodent models of HC function and high-resolution MRI studies in humans have sought to establish the contributions of individual HC subfields to specific mnemonic functions. For example, the dentate gyrus (DG) has been closely linked to pattern separation (6). Developmental findings from animal models (13) and initial evidence from human studies (14) suggest that the DG matures later than other HC subfields. Likewise, memory funct...