2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2510-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume expansion of albumin, gelatin, hydroxyethyl starch, saline and erythrocytes after haemorrhage in the rat

Abstract: Albumin 5% was a more effective plasma volume expander than gelatin and HES. Saline, with a four times larger volume, and erythrocytes in about 1/3 of the volume had a similar volume-expanding effect to gelatin and HES.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in venous pressure, however, cannot explain the difference in plasma expansion between the groups as the better the plasma expansion of the solution the higher the venous pressure. The fact that central venous pressures measured in 4 separate rats given the best plasma expander albumin did not increase to values above normal (see Results) also indicate that a difference in venous pressure cannot explain the difference between plasma expansion in the present and the previous study [27]. Nor can the difference in Hb explain the difference in plasma expansion between the 2 studies, as experimental studies have shown that plasma leakage is lower at a high than at a lowered Hb [28], and the Hb values were higher in the present study than in our previous study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Differences in venous pressure, however, cannot explain the difference in plasma expansion between the groups as the better the plasma expansion of the solution the higher the venous pressure. The fact that central venous pressures measured in 4 separate rats given the best plasma expander albumin did not increase to values above normal (see Results) also indicate that a difference in venous pressure cannot explain the difference between plasma expansion in the present and the previous study [27]. Nor can the difference in Hb explain the difference in plasma expansion between the 2 studies, as experimental studies have shown that plasma leakage is lower at a high than at a lowered Hb [28], and the Hb values were higher in the present study than in our previous study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Thus, the blood pressure in the present study was 5-10 mmHg lower after infusion of the plasma expander and 15-20 mmHg lower at end of the experiments (Table 2 and ref 27). If blood pressure is a factor influencing transcapillary fluid loss as discussed above, the lower blood pressure have saved plasma in the present study compared to the previous study [27]. Thus, also this factor means that the effect of permeability on plasma volume leakage, if anything, is underrated when making a direct comparison between the 2 studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some trials have reported that HES is superior to albumin or gelatin solutions (Palumbo et al 2006, Kuitunen et al 2007. In an experimental model of hemorrhagic shock, the hemodynamic effect was better with HES than with crystalloid solutions (Persson and Grande 2005). The amount of crystalloid needed to maintain similar hemodynamics was greater than that of HES (Lang et al 2001).…”
Section: Hemodynamic Effects Of Hydroxyethyl Starchesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies have demonstrated stable hemodynamics to be associated with the use of albumin in experimental (Persson and Grande 2005) and clinical studies (Karanko et al 1987, Kuitunen et al 2007). In comparison with synthetic colloids, no differences were observable in cardiac performance after the postoperative administration of HES or albumin solutions (Moggio et al 1983, Kirklin et al 1984, London et al 1989, Mastroianni et al 1994.…”
Section: Hemodynamic Effects Of Albuminmentioning
confidence: 99%