2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume changes of wheat and barley soaking in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11. Brown rice (9.614 ± 0.004) e × 10 -6 (6.410 ± 0.001) × 10 -4 (6.070 ± 0.036) × 10 -4 3.790 × 10 -6 0.9999 30% milled rice (9.706 ± 0.004) × 10 -6 (6.398 ± 0.001) × 10 -4 (4.156 ± 0.042) × 10 -4 3.773 × 10 -6 0.9999 50% milled rice (9.692 ± 0.007) × 10 -6 (6.360 ± 0.002) × 10 -4 (5.022 ± 0.071) × 10 -4 4.149 × 10 -6 0.9996 70% milled rice (9.653 ± 0.004) × 10 -6 (6.407 ± 0.001) × 10 -4 (2.977 ± 0.036) × 10 -4 3.054 × 10 -6 0.9999 Milled rice (9.576 ± 0.004) × 10 -6 (6.361 ± 0.001) × 10 -4 (4.325 ± 0.037) × 10 -4 3.520 × 10 -6 0.9999 Tagawa et al (2002) and Muramatsu et al (2006) represented the relationship between the specific volume (dry basis) of kidney beans, wheat, and barley, and both moisture content and temperature using Eq. 12 12) In this study, to confirm the adaptability of Eq.…”
Section: Volume Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11. Brown rice (9.614 ± 0.004) e × 10 -6 (6.410 ± 0.001) × 10 -4 (6.070 ± 0.036) × 10 -4 3.790 × 10 -6 0.9999 30% milled rice (9.706 ± 0.004) × 10 -6 (6.398 ± 0.001) × 10 -4 (4.156 ± 0.042) × 10 -4 3.773 × 10 -6 0.9999 50% milled rice (9.692 ± 0.007) × 10 -6 (6.360 ± 0.002) × 10 -4 (5.022 ± 0.071) × 10 -4 4.149 × 10 -6 0.9996 70% milled rice (9.653 ± 0.004) × 10 -6 (6.407 ± 0.001) × 10 -4 (2.977 ± 0.036) × 10 -4 3.054 × 10 -6 0.9999 Milled rice (9.576 ± 0.004) × 10 -6 (6.361 ± 0.001) × 10 -4 (4.325 ± 0.037) × 10 -4 3.520 × 10 -6 0.9999 Tagawa et al (2002) and Muramatsu et al (2006) represented the relationship between the specific volume (dry basis) of kidney beans, wheat, and barley, and both moisture content and temperature using Eq. 12 12) In this study, to confirm the adaptability of Eq.…”
Section: Volume Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When rice absorbs water, its volume increases about twofold; therefore, data on the volume changes of rice soaked in water are required when designing processing plants and optimizing processing operations. Tagawa et al (2002) and Muramatsu et al (2006) reported the volume changes of kidney beans, wheat, and barley upon soaking in water. Although it would be useful to consider the relationship of bulk density to moisture content, very few studies have measured bulk density over a range of moisture contents consistent with water absorption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear model (Eqn ) was proposed to estimate the bulk volumes of hydrated wheat and barley. In the model, the volume balance followed Eqn , and Eqn was derived.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts were made to develop mathematical models that could simultaneously incorporate moisture level and particle size for both handling procedures. The model development was also compared with the approach used in the prediction of volume changes of two agro‐materials, namely wheat and barley . The information generated in this study is aimed to assist SSF practitioners in the prediction of PKC bulk properties for the development and design of large‐scaled SSF equipment and for the interpretation of fermentation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of moisture content, bulk density and porosity (calculated from the bulk density and particle density), at which the effective thermal conductivity of the sample was measured, are shown in Table 1. The particle density of each sample was measured by the liquid displacement method using a Gay-Lussac-type pycnometer (Model 82-2355, Sansyo Co., Ltd., Japan) with a volume of approximately 100 cc (Muramatsu, Tagawa, Kasai, & Takeya, 2006;Tagawa et al, 2002). For each of the conditions of moisture content and bulk density described in Table 1, the effective thermal conductivity of the sample was measured at five different temperatures (10, 20, 30, 40, 50°C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%