1998
DOI: 10.1109/20.650225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume average demagnetizing tensor of rectangular prisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1. In addition, we have included the values predicted by the magnetometric approach [5], which assumes a uniform magnetization, but averages the demagnetization field to arrive at overall demagnetization factors. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fig 1 Shows the Measured Hard-axis B-h Loops For Three Pattmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. In addition, we have included the values predicted by the magnetometric approach [5], which assumes a uniform magnetization, but averages the demagnetization field to arrive at overall demagnetization factors. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fig 1 Shows the Measured Hard-axis B-h Loops For Three Pattmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-known perturbation theoretical calculations in the literature [4], however, assume a large, additionally applied DC magnetic field, which cannot be realized in IC applications. The magnetometric approximation [5], on the other hand, does not use a DC field, but assumes a uniform magnetization in the whole sample. This approach looses its validity in on-chip designs were nonellipsoidal (rectangular) samples are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The demagnetizing field is calculated by using the surface charge model 42) . The demagnetizing field acting on one calculation cell is the sum of the magnetic fields from the magnetic charges appearing on all the cells (Eq.…”
Section: Calculation Conditions and Magnetic Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] The stray field is obtained directly using volume (micromagnetic cell) averaged expressions. 24 Calculation time is reduced by computing the stray field from farther cells as the field due to a larger effective cell whose magnetization is the average of the small contained ones. 25 The exchange field is obtained using a six-neighbor scheme with appropriate boundary conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%