Volume and temperature transports through the main Arctic Gateways: A comparative study between an ocean reanalysis and mooring-derived data

Abstract

Oceanic transports through the Arctic gateways represent an integral part of the polar climate system, but comprehensive insitu-based estimates of this quantity have been lacking in the past. New observation-based estimates of oceanic volume, 15 temperature and freshwater transports have recently become available. Those estimates have been derived from moored observations in the four major gateways by applying mass and salinity constraints. We seize this opportunity to compare a recent ocean reanalysis release with those observation-based estimates. First, time series of integrated volume and temperature transports through each strait are considered. Good agreement is found for Davis Strait volume transports, but considerable disagreement of up to 1.1 Sv in Fram Strait and the Barents Sea Opening. The annual mean net volume export through the 20 gateways is -0.03 ± 0.23 Sv in the reanalysis, weaker than the -0.15 ± 0.06 Sv derived from the observation-based estimate (uncertainties represent the monthly standard deviation). The net ocean heat transport to the Arctic Ocean is similar in the two datasets (observation-based: 153 ± 44 TW, reanalysis: 145 ± 35 TW). Discrepancies in the integrated transports are further investigated by studying cross-sections of velocity, temperature and temperature flux density. These reveal good qualitative agreement in all straits, but considerable differences in the strength of major features like the East Greenland Current and the 25 West Spitzbergen Current. Examination of the instrumental coverage reveals that areas of discrepancy are often co-located with poorly observed regions. In conclusion, both types of data sets have their merits and are recommended to be used complementarily for climate studies in this data-sparse region. We hope that the results presented in this study can assist in planning future observational efforts and in the development of ocean reanalysis products. 30Ocean Sci. Discuss., https://doi

Atlantic Water Heat Transport Variability in the 20th Century Arctic Ocean From a Global Ocean Model and Observations

“…Most models in the CORE‐II experiment were coarse like NorESM; most models had 1 ∘ horizontal resolution, three models had 0.5 ∘ resolution, and one model had 0.25 ∘ resolution. The same was found by Pietschnig et al (), and this is also the case in our simulation, with a northward transport of about 3–4 Sv in the FS. In the BSO, Tsubouchi et al () estimated a volume transport just above 2 Sv, which is consistent with observations provided by Smedsrud et al () and the CORE‐II experiment.…”

The role of Arctic gateways on sea ice and circulation in the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans: a sensitivity study with an ocean-sea-ice model

“…within the range reported in ocean reanalysis experiments of C-GLORSv7(Pietschnig et al 2017). The overestimation of Bering Strait inflow in our model, which is also commonly seen in global simulations (e.g.,Ilicak et al 2016), comes from using the open boundary forcing retrieved from a global NEMO simulation (Sect.…”

Validation of key Arctic energy and water budget components in CMIP6

“…All CMIP6 models with a horizontal resolution of 1/4 degree simulate an OHT peak in autumn, similar to the observational ArcGate estimate, while coarser resolution models do not show such a peak. Somewhat surprisingly, the reanalysis-based estimates, which also feature a horizontal resolution of 1/4 degree, do not simulate such a peak, however they are known to have a cold bias in the West Greenland Current (Pietschnig et al 2017). The high resolution CMIP6 models however feature stronger and warmer West Greenlandic Currents and stronger, but similarly tempered, Baffin Island currents during autumn (see Fig.…”